18 Best Alternatives to Act-On in November 2024

I believe Act-On is a great alternative to Constant Contact because of its advanced marketing automation features. While both platforms provide email marketing services, Act-On goes a step further by offering website visitor tracking, CRM integration, lead scoring, and social media management. This makes it a more comprehensive solution for businesses looking to streamline their marketing efforts.

Act-On also provides a user-friendly interface which makes it easier to create and manage campaigns. Plus, it offers robust analytics and reporting tools that help businesses measure the effectiveness of their campaigns and make data-driven decisions. While Constant Contact is a good choice for small businesses or those just starting with email marketing, Act-On is more suited for medium to large businesses with more complex marketing needs.

As a writer, I can tell you that "act on" and "constant-contact" have distinct meanings. "Act on" is a phrase used to describe the process of taking action based on certain information or advice. It's an active process where an individual or group responds to a particular situation, often with the intention of influencing the outcome. For example, a manager may act on an employee's suggestion to improve a process at work.

Alternatively, "constant-contact" is usually associated with maintaining regular communication or interaction with someone or something. It's often used in a marketing context, where businesses strive to stay in constant contact with their customers to build relationships and promote their products or services. For instance, an email marketing platform may facilitate constant contact between a company and its customers.

Ortto has more positive reviews than Act-On: 91 vs 86

Ortto is easy to use compared to Act-On: 4.5 vs 4.0

Ortto pricing plans are more competitive than Act-On: 4.4 vs 3.9

Ortto is better at number of features than Act-On: 131 vs 102

I have found Act-On to be a great alternative to Ortto due to several reasons. Firstly, Act-On offers a more comprehensive set of features compared to Ortto. It has robust email marketing capabilities, CRM integration, social media management, and detailed analytics. This makes it a one-stop solution for all marketing automation needs.

Secondly, Act-On is known for its excellent customer support. They provide extensive resources and support channels to help users maximise their platform usage. The user-friendly interface also makes it easier to navigate and use, even for beginners.

Lastly, Act-On's pricing structure is flexible and scalable, making it a cost-effective choice for businesses of all sizes. Their pricing model allows for growth, unlike Ortto's fixed pricing tiers. Therefore, Act-On proves to be a more versatile and user-friendly alternative to Ortto.

I have examined both Act-On and OrttO software and found several differences. Act-On is a comprehensive marketing automation tool that facilitates email marketing, lead management, and social media marketing. It provides a user-friendly interface and advanced features like A/B testing, customer behavior tracking, and detailed analytics. It's ideal for medium to large businesses looking to streamline their marketing efforts.

On the other hand, OrttO is a more niche tool. It's primarily a link management software that helps businesses organize, shorten, and track URLs. It also supports QR code generation and offers basic analytics features. OrttO is best suited for businesses of all sizes that frequently share links across various platforms and want to keep them organized while gaining insights into click-through rates.

So, while both tools offer valuable features, their primary functions are quite different - Act-On focuses on marketing automation whereas OrttO is more about link management.

Act-On has better positive reviews compared to Salesforce Marketing Cloud: 86 vs 78

Act-On is better at customer service than Salesforce Marketing Cloud: 4.5 vs 3.5

Act-On is easier to use than Salesforce Marketing Cloud: 4.0 vs 3.5

Act-On is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Salesforce Marketing Cloud: 3.9 vs 3.7

Salesforce Marketing Cloud has more features than Act-On: 154 vs 102

I believe that the ServiceNow Customer Service Management (CSM) is a great alternative to Salesforce Marketing Cloud. This is primarily because ServiceNow CSM focuses on service-oriented processes and functions, making it more efficient in handling customer inquiries, complaints, and requests. It provides an end-to-end customer service management solution which allows businesses to connect with their customers in a more meaningful and effective way.

Moreover, ServiceNow CSM offers a single platform for all customer interactions, ensuring a unified and consistent customer experience. It also integrates seamlessly with other ServiceNow applications, providing a comprehensive view of the customer journey. Its emphasis on automation and AI-driven insights can significantly improve response times and resolution rates. These features make ServiceNow CSM an excellent option for businesses looking to streamline their customer service operations while improving customer satisfaction.

I have found that Act-On and Salesforce Marketing Cloud are both marketing automation platforms, but they differ significantly in terms of features, complexity, and pricing. Act-On is a more simplified, user-friendly tool, designed for small to medium-sized businesses. It offers features like email marketing, lead management, and website visitor tracking.

Conversely, Salesforce Marketing Cloud is a more comprehensive and complex platform, suitable for large enterprises. In addition to basic marketing automation features, it provides advanced options such as predictive analytics, customer journey mapping, and social media management. Salesforce Marketing Cloud is also more expensive than Act-On.

In summary, while both tools offer marketing automation capabilities, Act-On is more affordable and easier to use for smaller businesses while Salesforce Marketing Cloud offers advanced features suitable for larger organizations with bigger budgets.

Act-On has better positive reviews than Keap: 86 vs 78

Act-On is better at customer support than Keap: 4.5 vs 4.0

Act-On is easier to set up than Keap: 4.0 vs 3.5

Act-On is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Keap: 3.9 vs 3.8

Keap is more versatile than Act-On: 145 vs 102

Topic has more positive reviews than Act-On: 100 vs 86

Topic is better at support than Act-On: 5.0 vs 4.5

Topic is more user friendly than Act-On: 5.0 vs 4.0

Topic is better at value for money than Act-On: 4.9 vs 3.9

Act-On has more options than Topic: 102 vs 16

Act-On has better positive reviews than Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (ex. Pardot): 86 vs 79

Act-On is better at customer support than Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (ex. Pardot): 4.5 vs 4.0

Act-On is better at value for money than Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (ex. Pardot): 3.9 vs 3.7

Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (ex. Pardot) has more options than Act-On: 118 vs 102

Influitive has better positive reviews than Act-On: 98 vs 86

Influitive is better at customer support than Act-On: 5.0 vs 4.5

Influitive's user interface is more convenient than Act-On: 4.5 vs 4.0

Influitive pricing plans are more competitive than Act-On: 4.5 vs 3.9

Influitive is more versatile than Act-On: 134 vs 102

I believe Influitive is a great alternative to Act-On because it puts a unique spin on marketing automation by focusing on advocacy marketing. Unlike Act-On, which is more of a general marketing automation platform, Influitive enables businesses to turn their best customers into brand advocates. This approach can generate more organic and genuine engagement and leads.

Additionally, Influitive offers a user-friendly interface with a gamified experience for customers. This makes it more engaging and appealing for users. Plus, Influitive's capacity for personalization allows businesses to cater to their advocates in a way that feels more personal and less automated than some other platforms.

Lastly, Influitive also provides robust analytics tools, giving businesses the ability to track the success of their advocacy marketing efforts in real-time. These features make Influitive a compelling alternative to traditional marketing automation platforms like Act-On.

As a user of both Influitive and Act-On, I can confidently say that these two software vary significantly in their functionality and purpose. Influitive is primarily an advocacy marketing platform which allows businesses to tap into their existing customer base to drive new leads, reviews, referrals, and more. It’s all about maximizing customer engagement and loyalty.

On the other hand, Act-On is a comprehensive marketing automation tool. It's designed to manage and optimize all stages of the customer experience, from lead generation to customer retention. It offers functionalities like email marketing, landing page creation, CRM integration, and analytics. So, while Influitive focuses on leveraging current customers for advocacy, Act-On is more about managing and automating marketing efforts across the customer lifecycle.

Salesmanago marketing automation has more positive reviews than Act-On: 88 vs 86

Salesmanago marketing automation pricing plans are more competitive than Act-On: 4.4 vs 3.9

Act-On has more features than Salesmanago marketing automation: 102 vs 89

I believe that SALESmanago Marketing Automation is a great alternative to Act-On primarily because of its advanced features and cost-effectiveness. SALESmanago offers a comprehensive set of marketing automation tools, including email marketing, website visitor identification, mobile marketing, and social media marketing. Its AI-driven algorithms provide personalized customer experiences, enhancing engagement and conversion rates. It also provides real-time analytics, helping businesses make data-driven decisions.

Furthermore, compared to Act-On, SALESmanago is more affordable, making it an excellent choice for small and mid-sized businesses. It also offers a free version and a free trial period which you don't get with Act-On. The customer support service of SALESmanago is also commendable with options for live support, online training, and webinars. Therefore, considering the overall features and pricing, I find SALESmanago a better alternative to Act-On.

As a user, I find several differences between SALESmanago Marketing Automation and Act-On. Firstly, SALESmanago offers unique features like website visitor identification and tracking, dynamic e-mails with personalized product offers, and behavior-based automation rules. It also provides solutions for e-commerce, B2B companies, and other sectors. On the other hand, Act-On is more focused on providing a complete suite of applications including email marketing, website visitor tracking, lead management, social media management, reporting and analytics.

Another key difference is in their user interface. SALESmanago has a more complex interface which may require a learning curve for new users while Act-On has a more intuitive design that's easier to navigate. Lastly, in terms of pricing, SALESmanago provides custom pricing based on individual business needs while Act-On offers tiered pricing plans which can be more suitable for smaller businesses or startups.

Act-On has better positive reviews than Goldmine Premium Edition CRM: 86 vs 61

Act-On is better at customer support than Goldmine Premium Edition CRM: 4.5 vs 3.5

Act-On's user interface is more convenient than Goldmine Premium Edition CRM: 4.0 vs 3.5

Act-On pricing plans are more competitive than Goldmine Premium Edition CRM: 3.9 vs 3.3

Act-On has more options than Goldmine Premium Edition CRM: 102 vs 15

As a long-time user, I find GoldMine Premium Edition to be an excellent alternative to Act-On. It offers robust functionality for managing customer relationships and driving sales. Unlike Act-On, GoldMine provides offline access which is a huge advantage if you're often on the move or have unreliable internet. The interface is more user-friendly, making it easier to navigate and manage contacts, tasks, and appointments.

One of the key features that sets GoldMine apart is its one-time purchase model. This makes it a cost-effective solution in the long run as opposed to Act-On's recurring monthly fees. Also, GoldMine's customer service has been consistently superior, providing prompt and helpful support whenever needed. Overall, if you're looking for a comprehensive, easy-to-use CRM with excellent customer service and affordability, GoldMine Premium Edition is a solid choice.

As a user of both GoldMine Premium Edition and Act-On, I've noted several differences between the two. GoldMine Premium Edition is primarily a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software designed to help businesses manage their customer interactions. It offers features such as contact management, sales forecasting, and email integration. On the side of the alternative, Act-On is a marketing automation platform that focuses on lead management and nurturing. It provides tools for email marketing, social media management and website visitor tracking.

The primary difference lies in their functionalities: GoldMine is more CRM-focused with an emphasis on sales functions, while Act-On is geared towards marketing automation. Furthermore, Act-On has more advanced features for digital marketing strategies such as SEO and social media integration which GoldMine lacks. Therefore, the choice between the two would largely depend on whether your business needs are more sales or marketing-oriented.

Vbout has more positive reviews than Act-On: 99 vs 86

Vbout is better at support than Act-On: 5.0 vs 4.5

Vbout is more user friendly than Act-On: 4.5 vs 4.0

Vbout is better at value for money than Act-On: 4.9 vs 3.9

Act-On has more functions than Vbout: 102 vs 68

As a marketer, I find VBOUT a compelling alternative to Act-On. Firstly, VBOUT offers more comprehensive and intuitive marketing automation features. It allows for multi-channel integration, facilitating a seamless fusion of email marketing, social media management, landing page creation, and customer journey tracking all in one place. Unlike Act-On, VBOUT provides more customization options which can be tailored to meet specific business needs.

Secondly, VBOUT's pricing structure is more flexible and affordable, making it a cost-effective solution especially for small to medium-sized businesses. Additionally, their customer support is highly responsive and they offer extensive training resources. With its robust features, personalized approach, and cost-effectiveness, VBOUT emerges as a strong alternative to Act-On for businesses seeking to streamline their digital marketing efforts.

I used both VBOUT and Act-On and found distinct differences. VBOUT is a marketing automation platform designed to help businesses engage with customers across various digital channels. It offers features like email marketing, social media management, lead scoring, and analytics. The interface is user-friendly and it's easy to integrate with other tools.

Act-On, In a slightly different way, is a comprehensive marketing automation tool that focuses more on inbound marketing strategies. It provides advanced features like CRM integration, website visitor tracking, and detailed ROI reporting. While Act-On is more feature-rich, it can be a bit complex for beginners. In terms of pricing, VBOUT is more affordable than Act-On which makes it a better option for small businesses or startups with tight budgets.

Overall, the choice between VBOUT and Act-On depends on your business needs and budget.

Act-On is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Ontraport: 86 vs 78

Act-On is better at value for money than Ontraport: 3.9 vs 3.8

Ontraport has more features than Act-On: 117 vs 102

Wincher has better positive reviews compared to Act-On: 100 vs 86

Wincher is better at customer service than Act-On: 5.0 vs 4.5

Wincher is more user friendly than Act-On: 5.0 vs 4.0

Wincher is better at value for money than Act-On: 4.8 vs 3.9

Act-On is better at number of features than Wincher: 102 vs 18

Hivebrite has more positive reviews than Act-On: 96 vs 86

Hivebrite is better at support than Act-On: 4.8 vs 4.5

Hivebrite is more user friendly than Act-On: 4.5 vs 4.0

Hivebrite is better at value for money than Act-On: 4.3 vs 3.9

Act-On has more options than Hivebrite: 102 vs 96

Act-On is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Xeno: 86 vs 85

Xeno is a better solution for customer support than Act-On: 4.6 vs 4.5

Xeno's user interface is more convenient than Act-On: 4.5 vs 4.0

Xeno pricing plans are more competitive than Act-On: 4.4 vs 3.9

Act-On has more functions than Xeno: 102 vs 52