12 Best Alternatives to Google Voice in December 2024

Google Voice has better positive reviews than RingCentral MVP: 92 vs 80

Google Voice is better at customer support than RingCentral MVP: 4.2 vs 4.0

Google Voice's user interface is more convenient than RingCentral MVP: 4.6 vs 4.0

Google Voice pricing plans are more competitive than RingCentral MVP: 4.7 vs 4.0

RingCentral MVP has more options than Google Voice: 79 vs 8

I find Google Voice to be a great alternative to RingCentral MVP due to its simplicity, affordability, and integration with other Google services. Unlike RingCentral MVP, which can be quite expensive especially for small businesses, Google Voice is free for personal use and comes at a lower cost for G Suite customers. It provides features like voicemail transcription, call forwarding, and international calling at a fraction of the cost. Moreover, Google Voice seamlessly integrates with other Google services such as Gmail and Google Calendar, making it easier to manage communications in one place. The interface is user-friendly and doesn't require extensive training or technical knowledge. Thus, for those looking for a cost-effective and uncomplicated business communication solution, Google Voice is an excellent choice.

I have found that Google Voice and RingCentral MVP are both VoIP services, but they cater to different needs. Google Voice is a free service primarily designed for personal use. It provides a phone number that can be used across devices, voicemail transcription, and international calling capabilities. However, it lacks advanced features like auto-attendant or multi-level IVR.

Alternatively, RingCentral MVP is a full-fledged business communication solution. It offers not only VoIP phone service but also video conferencing, team messaging, and even fax. Its features are more sophisticated including call forwarding to multiple devices, auto-receptionist, and integration with CRM software. While RingCentral provides more comprehensive services suitable for businesses of all sizes, it comes with a monthly fee.

Google Voice is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Grasshopper: 92 vs 86

Grasshopper is a better solution for customer support than Google Voice: 4.4 vs 4.2

Google Voice's user interface is more convenient than Grasshopper: 4.6 vs 4.4

Google Voice pricing plans are more competitive than Grasshopper: 4.7 vs 4.4

Grasshopper has more options than Google Voice: 24 vs 8

As a small business owner, I find Google Voice to be an excellent alternative to Grasshopper. The primary reason is cost-effectiveness. Google Voice offers a free version with basic features which is suitable for startups or small businesses. It also integrates seamlessly with other Google services like Gmail and Google Calendar, making it easier to manage my business operations. The transcription feature in Google Voice is quite accurate and saves time when responding to voicemails. Additionally, its user-friendly interface makes it easy even for non-tech savvy individuals to navigate through the platform. While Grasshopper may offer more advanced features, for a small business looking for cost efficiency and ease of use, Google Voice is a commendable option.

I have been using both Google Voice and Grasshopper for my communication needs and I've noticed several differences between the two. Google Voice is a free service that offers basic features like voicemail, call forwarding, and text messaging. It's perfect for personal use or small businesses with minimal communication needs. On the other hand, Grasshopper is a paid service that offers more advanced features tailored for businesses. These include multiple extensions, business texting, and custom greetings. Grasshopper also provides a professional touch with a dedicated business number, which Google Voice doesn't offer. However, Google Voice excels in international calling with lower rates compared to Grasshopper. So, if you're running a business with more complex communication needs, Grasshopper might be the better choice. But for personal use or small-scale operations, Google Voice should suffice.

I find Google Voice to be a great alternative to OpenPhone. With its robust set of features, Google Voice offers the flexibility and convenience I need in a business communication tool. It provides free calls within the US and Canada, affordable international rates, and the ability to send text messages. Not only that, but it also offers voicemail transcription services which is a big plus for me. Furthermore, Google Voice integrates seamlessly with other Google services such as Gmail and Google Meet, enhancing productivity and efficiency in communication. Its user-friendly interface makes it easy for me to navigate and manage my calls and messages. The best part is that it's free for personal use, which is perfect for small businesses or startups looking to minimize costs.

WhatsApp has better positive reviews compared to Google Voice: 96 vs 92

WhatsApp is better at customer service than Google Voice: 4.5 vs 4.2

WhatsApp is easy to use compared to Google Voice: 5.0 vs 4.6

WhatsApp has more features than Google Voice: 25 vs 8

Google Voice is better at customer support than Vonage: 4.2 vs 3.7

Google Voice is easier to set up than Vonage: 4.6 vs 4.1

Google Voice is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Vonage: 4.7 vs 3.8

Google Voice has more positive reviews than The SaaSy People: 92 vs 85

The SaaSy People is better at support than Google Voice: 4.6 vs 4.2

Google Voice is more user friendly than The SaaSy People: 4.6 vs 4.5

Google Voice is better at value for money than The SaaSy People: 4.7 vs 4.4

The SaaSy People is better at number of features than Google Voice: 52 vs 8

Google Voice has more positive reviews than Dialpad: 92 vs 87

Dialpad is better at support than Google Voice: 4.5 vs 4.2

Google Voice is easier to use than Dialpad: 4.6 vs 4.5

Google Voice is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Dialpad: 4.7 vs 4.3

Dialpad is more versatile than Google Voice: 82 vs 8

Google Voice is better at support than Nextiva: 4.2 vs 4.0

Google Voice is easier to use than Nextiva: 4.6 vs 4.0

Google Voice is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Nextiva: 4.7 vs 3.9

Acefone is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Google Voice: 97 vs 92

Acefone is a better solution for customer support than Google Voice: 5.0 vs 4.2

Google Voice's user interface is more convenient than Acefone: 4.6 vs 4.5

Acefone has more functions than Google Voice: 91 vs 8

Truelark has better positive reviews than Google Voice: 98 vs 92

Truelark is better at customer support than Google Voice: 5.0 vs 4.2

Google Voice is better at ease to use than Truelark: 4.6 vs 4.5

Google Voice is better at value for money than Truelark: 4.7 vs 4.6

Truelark has more features than Google Voice: 40 vs 8