23 Best Alternatives to Greenhouse in November 2024

Greenhouse has better positive reviews compared to ZipRecruiter: 94 vs 78

Greenhouse is better at customer service than ZipRecruiter: 4.5 vs 4.2

Greenhouse is easier to use than ZipRecruiter: 4.5 vs 4.4

Greenhouse is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than ZipRecruiter: 4.3 vs 4.0

Greenhouse has more functions than ZipRecruiter: 73 vs 29

I believe Greenhouse is a great alternative to ZipRecruiter due to its comprehensive suite of features. What sets Greenhouse apart is its powerful applicant tracking system (ATS) that provides a holistic view of the recruitment process. It offers detailed analytics and reporting tools, enabling you to make data-driven decisions. Furthermore, it has an intuitive interface and seamless integration capabilities with other HR tools, which simplifies the hiring process. Unlike ZipRecruiter, Greenhouse also offers onboarding tools, making it a one-stop solution for the entire hiring life cycle. Lastly, Greenhouse focuses on promoting diversity and inclusion in hiring practices, which is increasingly vital in today's global workforce. Therefore, for its comprehensive offerings and commitment to inclusive hiring, I find Greenhouse a good alternative to ZipRecruiter.

I have found that Greenhouse and ZipRecruiter, while both being recruitment platforms, offer distinct features and cater to different needs. Greenhouse is primarily an applicant tracking system (ATS) used by companies to manage their hiring process. It provides tools for sourcing candidates, managing interviews, and maintaining candidate databases. It's more suited for businesses wanting a comprehensive recruitment solution.

On the other hand, ZipRecruiter is primarily a job posting site where employers can post job ads and receive applications directly. It has a broad reach with over 7 million active job seekers and uses AI-driven smart matching technology to connect employers with the right candidates. While it does provide some ATS features, its primary focus is on job advertising and distribution. Therefore, it's more suited for businesses who want to cast a wide net to attract potential applicants.

Greenhouse has better positive reviews compared to JobDiva: 94 vs 92

JobDiva is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Greenhouse: 4.4 vs 4.3

JobDiva is better at number of features than Greenhouse: 82 vs 73

I find Greenhouse to be a great alternative to JobDiva because it offers a more user-friendly interface. It's intuitive and easy to navigate, allowing me to manage the entire recruitment process efficiently. It has a robust analytics feature that helps in tracking the progress of candidates, making it easier for me to make informed decisions. The platform also integrates seamlessly with various HR tools, enhancing its functionality.

Moreover, Greenhouse's customer support is top-notch. They are always ready to assist in case of any difficulties, ensuring minimal disruptions in operations. Additionally, they offer comprehensive training materials that are beneficial in understanding how to maximize the use of the software.

While JobDiva also has its strengths, I believe that Greenhouse's ease of use, advanced features, and excellent customer support make it a superior choice.

I have found that Greenhouse and JobDiva are both powerful tools in the recruitment industry but they differ in their primary functionalities. Greenhouse is predominantly an Applicant Tracking System (ATS) that helps companies manage job postings, track applicants, and streamline the hiring process. It provides a collaborative platform for recruiters to work together and make hiring decisions.

For its part, JobDiva is a complete Talent Acquisition Suite that integrates ATS, CRM (Customer Relationship Management), VMS (Vendor Management System), and Onboarding capabilities. It not only assists in tracking applicants but also aids in maintaining relationships with candidates, clients, and vendors. JobDiva also offers advanced features like resume harvesting and automated job matching.

In essence, while Greenhouse focuses on simplifying the hiring process, JobDiva provides a comprehensive solution for all aspects of talent acquisition and management.

Greenhouse has better positive reviews compared to iCIMS Talent Cloud: 94 vs 87

Greenhouse is easy to use compared to iCIMS Talent Cloud: 4.5 vs 4.0

Greenhouse pricing plans are more competitive than iCIMS Talent Cloud: 4.3 vs 4.1

iCIMS Talent Cloud has more features than Greenhouse: 86 vs 73

I believe Greenhouse is a great alternative to iCims-Talent-Cloud due to several reasons. Firstly, Greenhouse offers a more user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to navigate and manage their recruitment process. It also provides robust analytics and reporting tools that help in making data-driven decisions. Secondly, Greenhouse's integration capabilities are superior. It can seamlessly integrate with various HR systems, job boards, and social media platforms, which is crucial for a comprehensive recruitment strategy. Lastly, Greenhouse offers excellent customer support, ensuring any issues or queries are promptly addressed. While iCims-Talent-Cloud is a good platform, the advanced features, ease of use, and superior support make Greenhouse a more appealing choice for many businesses.

I have found that Greenhouse and iCIMS Talent Cloud are both powerful recruitment software solutions, but they differ in several ways. Greenhouse is known for its robust features that streamline the entire hiring process, from sourcing to onboarding. It offers a high level of customization, allowing companies to tailor the software to their specific needs. On the other hand, iCIMS Talent Cloud is recognized for its scalability and comprehensive suite of tools that cover not only recruitment but also talent management and employee engagement. It also integrates well with other HR systems, making it a more holistic solution. While both platforms offer analytics and reporting features, iCIMS provides more advanced metrics. In terms of user experience, Greenhouse is often praised for its intuitive interface, while iCIMS may require a steeper learning curve.

Greenhouse has more positive reviews than Jobvite: 94 vs 79

Greenhouse is better at support than Jobvite: 4.5 vs 4.0

Greenhouse is more user friendly than Jobvite: 4.5 vs 4.1

Greenhouse is better at value for money than Jobvite: 4.3 vs 4.0

Greenhouse is more versatile than Jobvite: 73 vs 58

Greenhouse is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Workable: 94 vs 90

Greenhouse is better at value for money than Workable: 4.3 vs 4.1

Workable has more options than Greenhouse: 101 vs 73

Greenhouse has better positive reviews than Zoho Recruit: 94 vs 91

Greenhouse is better at customer support than Zoho Recruit: 4.5 vs 4.0

Zoho Recruit is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Greenhouse: 4.6 vs 4.3

Zoho Recruit has more functions than Greenhouse: 99 vs 73

BambooHR has better positive reviews than Greenhouse: 95 vs 94

BambooHR is easier to set up than Greenhouse: 4.6 vs 4.5

BambooHR is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Greenhouse: 4.5 vs 4.3

BambooHR has more features than Greenhouse: 145 vs 73

Greenhouse has better positive reviews compared to Breezy: 94 vs 93

Breezy is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Greenhouse: 4.5 vs 4.3

Greenhouse has more features than Breezy: 73 vs 62

Greenhouse is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than JazzHR: 94 vs 90

JazzHR is better at value for money than Greenhouse: 4.4 vs 4.3

Greenhouse is more versatile than JazzHR: 73 vs 68

Greenhouse is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Freshteam: 94 vs 90

Greenhouse is a better solution for customer support than Freshteam: 4.5 vs 4.0

Freshteam is better at value for money than Greenhouse: 4.4 vs 4.3

Greenhouse has more features than Freshteam: 73 vs 66

Ashby has more positive reviews than Greenhouse: 100 vs 94

Ashby is better at support than Greenhouse: 4.8 vs 4.5

Ashby is easy to use compared to Greenhouse: 5.0 vs 4.5

Ashby pricing plans are more competitive than Greenhouse: 4.8 vs 4.3

Greenhouse has more functions than Ashby: 73 vs 3

Greenhouse has better positive reviews compared to Dayforce HCM: 94 vs 86

Greenhouse is better at customer service than Dayforce HCM: 4.5 vs 4.0

Greenhouse is easier to use than Dayforce HCM: 4.5 vs 4.0

Greenhouse is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Dayforce HCM: 4.3 vs 4.2

Dayforce HCM has more functions than Greenhouse: 94 vs 73

Ceipal ATS has more positive reviews than Greenhouse: 95 vs 94

Ceipal ATS pricing plans are more competitive than Greenhouse: 4.6 vs 4.3

Ceipal ATS is better at number of features than Greenhouse: 94 vs 73

Greenhouse has more positive reviews than SmartRecruiters: 94 vs 83

Greenhouse is better at support than SmartRecruiters: 4.5 vs 4.3

Greenhouse is more user friendly than SmartRecruiters: 4.5 vs 4.3

Greenhouse is better at value for money than SmartRecruiters: 4.3 vs 4.2

Greenhouse has more features than SmartRecruiters: 73 vs 33

Greenhouse has better positive reviews than Hired: 94 vs 82

Greenhouse is better at customer support than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Greenhouse is better at ease to use than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Greenhouse is better at value for money than Hired: 4.3 vs 3.7

Greenhouse has more options than Hired: 73 vs 28

As someone who has utilized both Hired and Greenhouse, I find Hired to be a great alternative due to several reasons. Firstly, Hired offers a more candidate-centric approach. Its platform is designed to allow job seekers to showcase their skills and experiences comprehensively, making it easier for employers to find the right fit. Secondly, Hired's algorithm matches candidates with potential employers, saving time and effort in the hiring process. Thirdly, it provides transparency about salary ranges, reducing awkward negotiations. Lastly, Hired offers a personalized talent advocate who guides candidates throughout their job search journey. While Greenhouse is excellent for its applicant tracking system, Hired's unique features make it an attractive alternative for both job seekers and employers.

As an HR professional, I can affirm that Hired and Greenhouse are two different tools used in the recruitment process, each with their own unique features. Hired is a career marketplace that connects tech talent with innovative companies. It focuses on the job seeker's experience, enabling them to showcase their skills and choose the opportunities they're interested in. Alternatively, Greenhouse is an applicant tracking system (ATS) used by employers to manage their hiring process. It offers features like job posting, candidate sourcing, interview scheduling and evaluation tools.

While both platforms aim to streamline the recruitment process, their primary difference lies in who they primarily serve. Hired is more candidate-centric, focusing on empowering job seekers, while Greenhouse is employer-centric, helping companies manage their hiring processes efficiently. Therefore, the choice between the two would depend on whether you're a job seeker or an employer.

Greenhouse has more positive reviews than Recruitee: 94 vs 91

Recruitee is more user friendly than Greenhouse: 4.6 vs 4.5

Greenhouse is more versatile than Recruitee: 73 vs 71

As a hiring manager, I find Recruitiee a great alternative to Greenhouse for several reasons. Firstly, Recruitiee offers a more intuitive and user-friendly interface which makes it easier to navigate through various features. Secondly, it offers robust analytics and reporting tools that allow me to track the performance of my hiring campaigns easily. Thirdly, Recruitiee provides excellent customer support that is very responsive and helpful, unlike Greenhouse where users sometimes report issues with customer service. Lastly, Recruitiee is more cost-effective, making it a better choice for small to medium-sized businesses with budget constraints. Therefore, considering these factors, I believe that Recruitiee is not just an alternative, but in many ways superior to Greenhouse.

I have found that RecruitEE and Greenhouse are both effective recruitment software platforms, but they do have some key differences. For one, Greenhouse is a larger platform with a broader range of features, including onboarding and performance management tools. It also offers more integrations with other software and has a more complex user interface.

On the side of the alternative, RecruitEE is a more streamlined platform focused primarily on the recruitment process. It's simpler to use and offers a more intuitive user interface. Additionally, it provides an excellent candidate experience with its easy-to-use application process. While it may not have as many features or integrations as Greenhouse, it is a more cost-effective option for smaller businesses or those with less complex recruitment needs.

Vidcruiter has better positive reviews than Greenhouse: 96 vs 94

Vidcruiter is better at customer support than Greenhouse: 5.0 vs 4.5

Vidcruiter is better at value for money than Greenhouse: 4.7 vs 4.3

Vidcruiter has more functions than Greenhouse: 121 vs 73

Greenhouse is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Cornerstone recruiting: 94 vs 84

Greenhouse is a better solution for customer support than Cornerstone recruiting: 4.5 vs 4.0

Greenhouse is easier to set up than Cornerstone recruiting: 4.5 vs 4.0

Greenhouse is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Cornerstone recruiting: 4.3 vs 3.5

Greenhouse is more versatile than Cornerstone recruiting: 73 vs 64

Greenhouse is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Performly talent: 94 vs 81

Greenhouse is a better solution for customer support than Performly talent: 4.5 vs 4.3

Greenhouse is easier to set up than Performly talent: 4.5 vs 4.3

Performly talent has more features than Greenhouse: 81 vs 73

Greenhouse has more positive reviews than Wepow: 94 vs 93

Greenhouse is better at value for money than Wepow: 4.3 vs 4.2

Greenhouse has more functions than Wepow: 73 vs 29