17 Best Alternatives to SAP S/4HANA Cloud in November 2024

Acumatica has better positive reviews compared to SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 92 vs 90

Acumatica is more user friendly than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.3 vs 3.7

Acumatica is better at value for money than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.3 vs 3.9

Acumatica has more features than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 92 vs 35

I believe SAP ERP HANA Cloud is a good alternative to Acumatica due to several reasons. Firstly, SAP ERP is powered by the HANA platform which offers real-time analytics and applications, enabling faster and more efficient business processes. This is particularly beneficial for larger companies that require complex data analysis. Secondly, SAP's global presence and extensive support network far surpass that of Acumatica. This can be crucial in terms of implementation and ongoing support. Thirdly, SAP ERP HANA Cloud offers more customization options compared to Acumatica, providing flexibility to tailor the system according to specific business needs. Lastly, SAP has a longer track record and holds a stronger reputation in the market, which adds an extra layer of trust and reliability.

I find that SAP ERP HANA Cloud and Acumatica are two distinct cloud-based ERP solutions with unique offerings. SAP ERP HANA Cloud is a part of the larger SAP ecosystem, known for its robust functionalities, scalability, and deep industry-specific features. It's ideal for large enterprises with complex needs. Alternatively, Acumatica targets small to midsize businesses, offering a user-friendly interface and flexible licensing model that allows unlimited users. While both platforms support financial management, procurement, project management, and CRM, Acumatica also includes distribution management in its core system. Additionally, SAP ERP HANA Cloud is powered by the in-memory HANA database technology for real-time processing, while Acumatica uses Microsoft's technology stack. Finally, in terms of deployment, SAP ERP HANA Cloud is primarily offered as a SaaS solution while Acumatica offers both SaaS and on-premise options.

SAP S/4HANA Cloud has better positive reviews than Dynamics 365: 90 vs 87

SAP S/4HANA Cloud is better at customer support than Dynamics 365: 4.2 vs 4.0

Dynamics 365 is easier to set up than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.0 vs 3.7

Dynamics 365 is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.1 vs 3.9

Dynamics 365 has more functions than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 113 vs 35

As a software tester, I find SAP ERP Hana Cloud a compelling alternative to Dynamics 365 due to several reasons. Firstly, SAP's in-memory computing technology provides real-time data processing capabilities which significantly speeds up business processes. Secondly, Hana Cloud offers a high degree of customization allowing businesses to tailor the system according to their unique needs. It also provides robust analytics tools for better decision making. Furthermore, it's highly scalable, meaning it can grow with your business without requiring major system overhauls. Lastly, SAP's vast global network of support ensures you have access to help when you need it. Therefore, considering its superior processing speed, customization, scalability and strong support network, SAP ERP Hana Cloud stands out as a great alternative.

I have noticed several key differences between SAP ERP Hana Cloud and Dynamics 365. Firstly, SAP ERP Hana Cloud is a cloud-based enterprise resource planning (ERP) suite designed by SAP for large enterprises, offering a wide range of features including finance, HR, manufacturing, and supply chain management. It uses the in-memory computing capabilities of SAP HANA which allows for rapid data processing.

On the other hand, Dynamics 365 is a product of Microsoft, targeting both small to large enterprises. It combines CRM and ERP capabilities, providing solutions for sales, customer service, field service, retail, finance and operations, marketing, project service automation and more. Dynamics 365 integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft products like Outlook and Office 365.

In conclusion, while both provide comprehensive ERP solutions, the choice between SAP ERP Hana Cloud and Dynamics 365 may come down to your business size, specific needs, and existing software ecosystem.

SAP S/4HANA Cloud has more positive reviews than Sage Intacct: 90 vs 83

SAP S/4HANA Cloud is better at support than Sage Intacct: 4.2 vs 4.0

Sage Intacct is more user friendly than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.0 vs 3.7

Sage Intacct is better at value for money than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.0 vs 3.9

Sage Intacct has more options than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 244 vs 35

I believe SAP ERP HANA Cloud is a good alternative to Sage-Intacct due to its robust capabilities and flexibility. While Sage-Intacct is a strong solution for small to medium businesses, SAP's solution is designed to scale with businesses of all sizes. This makes it a more viable option for larger organizations or those expecting significant growth.

SAP ERP HANA Cloud offers real-time analytics, which allows for quick decision making. It is also known for its high-speed performance and in-memory computing technology, enabling businesses to process large volumes of data quickly. Additionally, it provides a wide range of features such as finance, HR, sales, service, procurement, and supply chain management.

Furthermore, SAP ERP HANA Cloud integrates seamlessly with other SAP products and third-party applications. This can be particularly beneficial for businesses already using or planning to use other SAP solutions.

I have researched and found that SAP ERP HANA Cloud and Sage Intacct are both leading providers of cloud-based ERP software, but they differ in several ways. SAP ERP HANA Cloud is a comprehensive solution that covers all business processes including finance, HR, sales, and services. It's designed for large enterprises and offers powerful analytics and real-time data processing. Conversely, Sage Intacct focuses more on financial management and accounting. It's ideal for small to mid-sized businesses. While both provide real-time visibility and analytics, Sage Intacct has a more user-friendly interface whereas SAP ERP HANA Cloud is praised for its robust functionality. The choice between the two would depend on the specific needs and size of your business.

SAP S/4HANA Cloud has better positive reviews than Odoo ERP: 90 vs 81

SAP S/4HANA Cloud is better at customer support than Odoo ERP: 4.2 vs 3.5

Odoo ERP is better at ease to use than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.0 vs 3.7

Odoo ERP is better at value for money than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.1 vs 3.9

Odoo ERP is better at number of features than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 81 vs 35

SAP S/4HANA Cloud has more positive reviews than Oracle NetSuite: 90 vs 82

SAP S/4HANA Cloud is better at support than Oracle NetSuite: 4.2 vs 3.7

Oracle NetSuite is easier to use than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 3.8 vs 3.7

SAP S/4HANA Cloud is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Oracle NetSuite: 3.9 vs 3.8

Oracle NetSuite has more options than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 332 vs 35

SAP S/4HANA Cloud is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than QuickBooks: 90 vs 85

SAP S/4HANA Cloud is a better solution for customer support than QuickBooks: 4.2 vs 4.0

QuickBooks is better at ease to use than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.0 vs 3.7

QuickBooks is better at value for money than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.1 vs 3.9

QuickBooks is more versatile than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 164 vs 35

SAP S/4HANA Cloud has better positive reviews compared to SAP Concur: 90 vs 85

SAP S/4HANA Cloud is better at customer service than SAP Concur: 4.2 vs 4.0

SAP Concur is easy to use compared to SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.0 vs 3.7

SAP Concur pricing plans are more competitive than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.0 vs 3.9

SAP Concur has more options than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 75 vs 35

I find SAP Concur a compelling alternative to SAP ERP Hana Cloud due to its robust features and user-friendly interface. Specifically, it offers comprehensive solutions for travel, expense, and invoice management, which are essential for businesses of all sizes. Its real-time data reporting and analysis tools provide valuable insights that help in strategic decision-making. Furthermore, SAP Concur integrates seamlessly with other business systems and applications, ensuring smooth operations and data consistency. Its mobile compatibility is also a significant advantage, allowing users to manage expenses on the go. While SAP ERP Hana Cloud also provides many of these features, the specific focus of SAP Concur on expense management makes it an attractive alternative for businesses looking to streamline this particular aspect.

In my opinion, SAP Concur and SAP ERP HANA Cloud serve different objectives within a business framework. SAP Concur is primarily focused on travel and expense management. It helps businesses manage employee expenditure, automate expense reports, and streamline the approval process. On the other hand, SAP ERP HANA Cloud is an enterprise resource planning tool that offers a broad range of functionalities. It integrates various business processes such as finance, sales, service, manufacturing, and supply chain management into one unified system.

While both are part of SAP's suite of solutions, they cater to distinct areas of business operations. The main difference lies in their functionality - SAP Concur for expense management and travel booking, while SAP ERP HANA Cloud for comprehensive business process integration and management.

SAP S/4HANA Cloud has more positive reviews than NetSuite: 90 vs 81

SAP S/4HANA Cloud is better at support than NetSuite: 4.2 vs 3.5

NetSuite is easy to use compared to SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.0 vs 3.7

SAP S/4HANA Cloud pricing plans are more competitive than NetSuite: 3.9 vs 3.7

NetSuite is more versatile than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 315 vs 35

I find NetSuite a compelling alternative to SAP ERP HANA Cloud due to its comprehensive suite of applications that cover all aspects of business operations. It offers robust financial management, customer relationship management (CRM), and ecommerce capabilities, which are easily scalable and customizable to fit any business size or industry. Unlike SAP, NetSuite is built on a single unified data model, which means information is shared seamlessly across all departments, enhancing visibility and efficiency. Furthermore, NetSuite's user-friendly interface and intuitive design make it easier to navigate and use compared to the more complex SAP system. Lastly, NetSuite's pricing structure is more flexible and cost-effective, especially for small to medium-sized businesses.

I find that NetSuite and SAP ERP HANA Cloud have distinct features and uses. NetSuite is a cloud-based solution that provides comprehensive functionalities for Financials, CRM, HR, and eCommerce. It's designed for small to mid-sized businesses and offers real-time access to critical information. It's also known for its user-friendly interface and ease of customization.

On the other hand, SAP ERP HANA Cloud is a more robust and complex system suitable for large enterprises. It offers advanced analytics capabilities due to its in-memory computing engine, HANA. This allows businesses to process large volumes of data in real-time. However, it may require more technical expertise to fully utilize its functionalities.

In summary, the choice between NetSuite and SAP ERP HANA Cloud would depend on the size of your business, your specific needs, and the level of technical expertise available within your organization.

Clari Copilot (ex. Wingman) has better positive reviews compared to SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 98 vs 90

Clari Copilot (ex. Wingman) is better at customer service than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.7 vs 4.2

Clari Copilot (ex. Wingman) is easier to use than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.8 vs 3.7

Clari Copilot (ex. Wingman) is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.7 vs 3.9

Clari Copilot (ex. Wingman) is better at number of features than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 81 vs 35

I believe the service Wingman by Clari is a good alternative to SAP ERP HANA Cloud for several reasons. First, it offers a user-friendly interface that makes it easier to navigate and understand data, especially for those with little technical background. Second, it provides real-time insights and predictive analytics which are essential for making informed business decisions. Additionally, Wingman by Clari offers seamless integration with other tools and platforms, enhancing its versatility. Lastly, it has a robust customer support system to assist users whenever they encounter issues. While SAP ERP HANA Cloud is also a powerful tool, its complexity can be overwhelming for some users. Therefore, for businesses looking for an intuitive, easy-to-use and efficient tool for sales analytics and forecasting, Wingman by Clari is a great alternative.

I have researched and analyzed two different software solutions, Wingman by Clari and SAP ERP HANA Cloud. These two platforms serve different purposes and have distinct features. Wingman by Clari is an AI-driven software primarily used for revenue operations, offering features such as forecasting, pipeline management, and deal insights. It helps sales teams make data-driven decisions, manage their pipelines, and improve their performance.

Conversely, SAP ERP HANA Cloud is a comprehensive cloud-based enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution. It integrates various business functions like finance, human resources, procurement, and supply chain management into one system. This platform is designed to streamline business processes, facilitate real-time decision-making, and enhance overall business efficiency. So, while both are powerful tools, they cater to different aspects of business operations.

Boomi is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 95 vs 90

Boomi is a better solution for customer support than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 4.2

Boomi is easier to set up than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 3.7

Boomi is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.3 vs 3.9

Boomi has more functions than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 56 vs 35

Jedox has better positive reviews than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 94 vs 90

Jedox is better at customer support than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 4.2

Jedox is easier to set up than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.2 vs 3.7

Jedox is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 3.9

Jedox has more features than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 93 vs 35

SAP S/4HANA Cloud has better positive reviews than Omnify: 90 vs 88

Omnify is better at customer support than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 4.2

Omnify's user interface is more convenient than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 3.7

Omnify pricing plans are more competitive than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 3.9

Omnify has more options than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 113 vs 35

Vendorpm is a better solution for customer support than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 5.0 vs 4.2

Vendorpm's user interface is more convenient than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 3.7

Vendorpm pricing plans are more competitive than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 3.9

Vendorpm has more options than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 43 vs 35

Tradogram is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 91 vs 90

Tradogram is a better solution for customer support than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 5.0 vs 4.2

Tradogram's user interface is more convenient than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 3.7

Tradogram pricing plans are more competitive than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.7 vs 3.9

Tradogram is more versatile than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 96 vs 35

Proqura is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 100 vs 90

Proqura is a better solution for customer support than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 5.0 vs 4.2

Proqura's user interface is more convenient than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 5.0 vs 3.7

Proqura pricing plans are more competitive than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.9 vs 3.9

Proqura has more features than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 60 vs 35

CloudBlue PSA has better positive reviews than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 91 vs 90

CloudBlue PSA is better at customer support than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 4.2

CloudBlue PSA's user interface is more convenient than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 3.7

CloudBlue PSA pricing plans are more competitive than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.3 vs 3.9

CloudBlue PSA is more versatile than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 296 vs 35

SAP S/4HANA Cloud has better positive reviews than Portail Auto-Entrepreneur: 90 vs 85

Portail Auto-Entrepreneur is better at customer support than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.6 vs 4.2

Portail Auto-Entrepreneur's user interface is more convenient than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.5 vs 3.7

Portail Auto-Entrepreneur pricing plans are more competitive than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 4.4 vs 3.9

Portail Auto-Entrepreneur is more versatile than SAP S/4HANA Cloud: 52 vs 35