11 Best Alternatives to Hired in December 2024

Greenhouse has more positive reviews than Hired: 94 vs 82

Greenhouse is better at support than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Greenhouse is easier to use than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Greenhouse is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Hired: 4.3 vs 3.7

Greenhouse has more features than Hired: 73 vs 28

As someone who has utilized both Hired and Greenhouse, I find Hired to be a great alternative due to several reasons. Firstly, Hired offers a more candidate-centric approach. Its platform is designed to allow job seekers to showcase their skills and experiences comprehensively, making it easier for employers to find the right fit. Secondly, Hired's algorithm matches candidates with potential employers, saving time and effort in the hiring process. Thirdly, it provides transparency about salary ranges, reducing awkward negotiations. Lastly, Hired offers a personalized talent advocate who guides candidates throughout their job search journey. While Greenhouse is excellent for its applicant tracking system, Hired's unique features make it an attractive alternative for both job seekers and employers.

As an HR professional, I can affirm that Hired and Greenhouse are two different tools used in the recruitment process, each with their own unique features. Hired is a career marketplace that connects tech talent with innovative companies. It focuses on the job seeker's experience, enabling them to showcase their skills and choose the opportunities they're interested in. Alternatively, Greenhouse is an applicant tracking system (ATS) used by employers to manage their hiring process. It offers features like job posting, candidate sourcing, interview scheduling and evaluation tools.

While both platforms aim to streamline the recruitment process, their primary difference lies in who they primarily serve. Hired is more candidate-centric, focusing on empowering job seekers, while Greenhouse is employer-centric, helping companies manage their hiring processes efficiently. Therefore, the choice between the two would depend on whether you're a job seeker or an employer.

Zoho Recruit has better positive reviews than Hired: 91 vs 82

Hired is better at customer support than Zoho Recruit: 4.4 vs 4.0

Zoho Recruit is easier to set up than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Zoho Recruit is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Hired: 4.6 vs 3.7

Zoho Recruit has more functions than Hired: 99 vs 28

I believe that the service hired is a great alternative to Zoho Recruit due to several reasons. First, it offers a more intuitive user interface, making it easier for users to navigate through the platform. Additionally, it provides more comprehensive and customizable reporting features that help in better tracking and analyzing recruitment processes. Unlike Zoho Recruit, this service also integrates seamlessly with various other HR systems and platforms which enhances its functionality. Furthermore, it offers excellent customer support, ensuring any issues or queries are resolved promptly. Lastly, while Zoho Recruit's pricing can be steep for some businesses, the service hired offers more flexible and affordable pricing plans. Therefore, considering all these factors, I find the service hired to be a superior alternative to Zoho Recruit.

As a user, I find significant differences between Hired and Zoho Recruit. Hired is a career marketplace that connects tech talent with innovative companies. It primarily focuses on industries like software engineering, data science, and design, allowing candidates to showcase their skills and experience to potential employers. On the other hand, Zoho Recruit is an applicant tracking system and recruitment software designed for agencies and corporate HRs worldwide. It offers a comprehensive set of features including sourcing, resume management, and onboarding tools.

While Hired is more about creating a network where the tech industry's top talents can be found by potential employers, Zoho Recruit is more about managing recruitment processes efficiently. The choice between these two software would depend on whether your priority lies in networking and talent discovery or in streamlining recruitment operations.

SmartRecruiters has more positive reviews than Hired: 83 vs 82

Hired is better at support than SmartRecruiters: 4.4 vs 4.3

Hired is more user friendly than SmartRecruiters: 4.4 vs 4.3

SmartRecruiters is better at value for money than Hired: 4.2 vs 3.7

SmartRecruiters has more features than Hired: 33 vs 28

I believe that Hired is a great alternative to SmartRecruiters because of its unique model and features. Unlike traditional recruitment platforms, Hired puts the candidate at the center of the hiring process. It allows candidates to showcase their skills and experience, and then companies apply to them, reversing the traditional recruitment process. This model can significantly reduce time-to-hire and ensure a better fit between candidates and companies.

Moreover, Hired uses advanced algorithms to match candidates with potential employers, ensuring that both parties are suitable for each other. It also provides a dedicated Talent Advocate to guide candidates through the hiring process, offering personalized advice and feedback. These features make Hired not just a recruitment platform, but a comprehensive career development solution.

I have found that Hired and SmartRecruiters offer different features and cater to different needs. Hired is a career marketplace that connects tech talent with innovative companies. It allows candidates to receive interview requests from employers with salary details upfront, thus providing transparency. It's more focused on the candidates, allowing them to showcase their skills and receive job offers.

Conversely, SmartRecruiters is a full-scale recruiting platform suitable for businesses of all sizes. It offers features like applicant tracking, candidate sourcing, and recruitment marketing. It's more employer-centric, providing tools to create and post job ads, screen and evaluate applicants, and manage the entire hiring process. While both platforms aim to simplify the recruitment process, Hired focuses on empowering job seekers, whereas SmartRecruiters provides comprehensive solutions for employers.

Ceipal ATS has more positive reviews than Hired: 95 vs 82

Ceipal ATS is better at support than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Ceipal ATS is easy to use compared to Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Ceipal ATS pricing plans are more competitive than Hired: 4.6 vs 3.7

Ceipal ATS is better at number of features than Hired: 94 vs 28

Indeed is better at customer support than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Indeed is better at ease to use than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Indeed is better at value for money than Hired: 4.4 vs 3.7

Remotive has better positive reviews compared to Hired: 85 vs 82

Remotive is better at customer service than Hired: 4.6 vs 4.4

Remotive is more user friendly than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Remotive is better at value for money than Hired: 4.7 vs 3.7

Remotive is better at number of features than Hired: 95 vs 28

Hired has better positive reviews compared to ZipRecruiter: 82 vs 78

Hired is better at customer service than ZipRecruiter: 4.4 vs 4.2

ZipRecruiter is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Hired: 4.0 vs 3.7

ZipRecruiter has more functions than Hired: 29 vs 28

Hired is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Performly talent: 82 vs 81

Hired is a better solution for customer support than Performly talent: 4.4 vs 4.3

Hired is easier to set up than Performly talent: 4.4 vs 4.3

Performly talent is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Hired: 4.3 vs 3.7

Performly talent has more features than Hired: 81 vs 28

Shine.com has more positive reviews than Hired: 100 vs 82

Shine.com is better at support than Hired: 5.0 vs 4.4

Hired is easier to use than Shine.com: 4.4 vs 4.3

Shine.com is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Hired: 4.6 vs 3.7

Shine.com is more versatile than Hired: 33 vs 28

Share a Job has better positive reviews compared to Hired: 85 vs 82

Share a Job is better at customer service than Hired: 4.6 vs 4.4

Share a Job is easier to use than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Share a Job is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Hired: 4.4 vs 3.7

Share a Job has more options than Hired: 52 vs 28