10 Best Alternatives to Atera in November 2024

ConnectWise Control has more positive reviews than Atera: 96 vs 95

Atera pricing plans are more competitive than ConnectWise Control: 4.7 vs 4.6

Atera has more features than ConnectWise Control: 131 vs 58

I believe Atera is a good alternative to ConnectWise Control due to several reasons. First, Atera offers a simple and user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to navigate and manage their tasks. Unlike ConnectWise Control, Atera provides an all-in-one solution that combines Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM), Professional Services Automation (PSA), and remote access into one powerful solution. This integration reduces the need for multiple platforms, saving time and resources.

Secondly, Atera’s pricing model is more flexible and cost-effective. It offers a straight-forward per technician pricing model, which is more affordable especially for small and medium-sized businesses. Lastly, Atera provides excellent customer service, which includes 24/7 support and a wealth of online resources. This ensures that any issues or queries are resolved quickly and efficiently.

I have noticed several differences between Atera and ConnectWise Control. Firstly, Atera is more of an all-in-one remote monitoring and management solution designed specifically for IT professionals. It integrates everything from remote access and support to ticketing, billing, reporting, and even real-time alerts in a single platform. This makes it a comprehensive tool for managing all aspects of IT service delivery.

Alternatively, ConnectWise Control is primarily a remote support, access, and meeting solution. It offers robust features for remote control and troubleshooting, as well as unattended access to devices. However, it doesn't include built-in features for ticketing or billing like Atera does. Therefore, while ConnectWise Control excels in providing remote services, Atera provides a broader range of management tools.

I believe Atera is a good alternative to Kaseya due to several reasons. Firstly, Atera offers a simple and intuitive interface which makes it easy to navigate, unlike Kaseya which can be quite complex to handle. Secondly, Atera operates on a per technician pricing model instead of charging per device. This makes it a more affordable option for businesses with a large number of devices. Thirdly, Atera provides integrated remote access and support capabilities, making it easier to manage and troubleshoot devices remotely. Lastly, Atera's customer support is highly responsive and helpful, ensuring that any issues are resolved promptly. These features make Atera an effective and cost-efficient alternative to Kaseya.

Comparing the two, I noticed that Atera and Kaseya are both effective IT management software, but they have some key differences. Atera is a cloud-based platform, which makes it easily accessible from anywhere. It offers a simple and intuitive interface, which is ideal for small to medium-sized businesses. Its pricing model is also straightforward, offering a per technician pricing rather than per device.

Kaseya, on the other hand, is more suited for larger enterprises with complex IT infrastructures. It provides more comprehensive features and functionalities, including IT documentation, network monitoring, and patch management. However, it can be more complex to navigate and its pricing model is based on the number of devices being managed, which can get expensive for larger networks.

Pulseway has more positive reviews than Atera: 97 vs 95

Pulseway has more functions than Atera: 163 vs 131

I believe Atera is a good alternative to Pulseway due to several reasons. Firstly, Atera provides an all-in-one solution that combines Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM), Professional Services Automation (PSA), and remote access into one powerful solution. This enables IT professionals to provide more efficient service and improve their productivity. Secondly, unlike Pulseway, Atera offers a straightforward pricing model based on the number of technicians rather than the number of devices. This can be more cost-effective for businesses managing a large number of devices. Lastly, Atera's intuitive interface and easy setup make it more user-friendly, especially for small and medium-sized businesses. Therefore, while Pulseway is certainly a strong tool, Atera's comprehensive features, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use make it a compelling alternative.

I have explored both Atera and Pulseway, two prominent remote monitoring and management (RMM) software. While they share similarities, there are key differences between them. Atera is a cloud-based RMM solution designed for IT professionals in small to medium-sized businesses. Its unique pricing structure, based on technician rather than endpoints, makes it cost-effective for smaller teams. It also includes integrated professional services automation (PSA) features.

Pulseway, Conversely, offers a comprehensive suite of tools that can be customized to match the specific needs of businesses of all sizes. It excels in mobile device management and provides real-time updates and automation capabilities. However, Pulseway’s pricing is based on endpoints, which can make it more expensive for larger networks. It doesn't include integrated PSA features but offers third party integrations. The choice between Atera and Pulseway depends on your business size, budget, and specific needs.

Atera pricing plans are more competitive than Slack: 4.7 vs 4.6

Atera has more functions than Slack: 131 vs 78

Atera has better positive reviews compared to Cleanmymac x: 95 vs 94

Cleanmymac x is better at customer service than Atera: 4.7 vs 4.5

Atera is more versatile than Cleanmymac x: 131 vs 94

Ninjaone is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Atera: 98 vs 95

Ninjaone is a better solution for customer support than Atera: 4.8 vs 4.5

Ninjaone is easier to set up than Atera: 4.8 vs 4.5

Atera is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Ninjaone: 4.7 vs 4.6

Atera has more options than Ninjaone: 131 vs 98

Altaro vm backup is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Atera: 98 vs 95

Altaro vm backup is a better solution for customer support than Atera: 4.8 vs 4.5

Altaro vm backup's user interface is more convenient than Atera: 4.8 vs 4.5

Atera has more features than Altaro vm backup: 131 vs 62

As a professional in the tech industry, I find Altaro VM Backup to be a great alternative to Atera. One of the main reasons is its specialization in virtual machine (VM) backup, which makes it a robust and reliable solution for businesses running VM environments. It supports both Microsoft Hyper-V and VMware, offering a broad range of compatibility.

Altaro VM Backup also stands out with its ease of use. The software has an intuitive interface that simplifies the backup and recovery process. It also offers features like deduplication, compression, and military-grade encryption to ensure data security. Moreover, Altaro provides excellent customer support, including a helpful online knowledge base and responsive live chat.

While Atera is a comprehensive IT management platform, if your primary need is VM backup, Altaro VM Backup is an excellent specialized alternative.

As an IT professional, I find Altaro VM Backup and Atera to be two distinct software solutions. Altaro VM Backup is a specialized tool designed primarily for backing up and restoring virtual machines (VMs). It supports platforms like Hyper-V and VMware, offering functionalities like deduplication, compression, encryption, and replication of VMs. It's a go-to for disaster recovery in virtualized environments.

On the other hand, Atera is a comprehensive remote monitoring and management (RMM) platform. It's more of an all-in-one IT management solution that includes functionalities like patch management, remote control, real-time alerts, ticketing, billing, reporting, and more. Atera supports a wide range of devices and is designed to help managed service providers (MSPs) or IT departments manage their IT infrastructure more efficiently.

In summary, while Altaro VM Backup focuses on VM backup and recovery, Atera provides a broader range of IT management tools.

Atera has better positive reviews compared to Datto siris: 95 vs 89

Atera pricing plans are more competitive than Datto siris: 4.7 vs 4.2

Atera is more versatile than Datto siris: 131 vs 41

Hsi donesafe is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Atera: 97 vs 95

Hsi donesafe is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Atera: 4.8 vs 4.7

Hsi donesafe has more features than Atera: 198 vs 131

Atera is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Syxsense: 4.7 vs 4.6

Atera has more functions than Syxsense: 131 vs 127