15 Best Alternatives to Microsoft Project in November 2024

Smartsheet has better positive reviews compared to Microsoft Project: 92 vs 90

Smartsheet is better at customer service than Microsoft Project: 4.5 vs 4.0

Smartsheet is easy to use compared to Microsoft Project: 4.5 vs 4.0

Smartsheet pricing plans are more competitive than Microsoft Project: 4.3 vs 4.1

Smartsheet has more functions than Microsoft Project: 219 vs 40

I find Microsoft Project to be a great alternative to Smartsheet due to its robust and versatile features. It offers seamless integration with other Microsoft applications, which greatly enhances productivity and collaboration. This is particularly useful for teams already using the Microsoft ecosystem. Additionally, it provides advanced project management tools like Gantt charts, project timelines, and budgeting capabilities that are more sophisticated compared to Smartsheet.

Microsoft Project also offers a high level of customization, allowing teams to tailor their workspace according to specific project needs. It also has superior reporting capabilities, offering detailed insights into project progress and performance. Lastly, its ability to handle complex projects with numerous tasks and resources makes it a more suitable option for large-scale projects.

In my opinion Microsoft Project and Smartsheet, while both project management tools, have distinct differences. Microsoft Project is a more traditional tool used for complex projects. It offers detailed features for project planning, scheduling, and resource allocation. It's ideal for large organizations handling intricate projects with a need for extensive customization.

On the other hand, Smartsheet provides a simpler, more user-friendly interface suitable for smaller teams or less complicated projects. Its spreadsheet-like layout makes it easy to use and understand. It also offers real-time collaboration, making it an excellent choice for teams working remotely or across different time zones.

In summary, while Microsoft Project offers more in-depth functionality for complex projects, Smartsheet provides a straightforward and collaborative approach suitable for simpler projects or smaller teams.

Jira is better at value for money than Microsoft Project: 4.3 vs 4.1

Jira has more features than Microsoft Project: 151 vs 40

I find Microsoft Project to be a compelling alternative to Jira for several reasons. Firstly, it offers robust project management features that go beyond issue and bug tracking. It excels in scheduling and planning, allowing users to create Gantt charts, set up dependencies, and allocate resources efficiently. Secondly, it provides comprehensive reporting tools that deliver insights into project progress and performance. This aids in making informed decisions and adjustments. Lastly, its integration with other Microsoft products such as Teams and Office 365 improves collaboration and communication within the team. This seamless integration makes it easier to manage tasks and projects without having to switch between different platforms. In conclusion, Microsoft Project's broad feature set and integration capabilities make it an effective alternative to Jira.

I have found that Microsoft Project and Jira are both powerful project management tools, but they serve different purposes. Microsoft Project is a traditional project management tool that is ideal for waterfall projects. It offers comprehensive features for planning, scheduling, and resource allocation to manage large-scale projects. Its strength lies in the ability to create complex project plans with intricate tasks dependencies.

Conversely, Jira is more flexible and agile-oriented. It's perfect for software development teams that work in sprints or iterations. It provides robust capabilities for issue tracking, bug tracking, and agile project management. Jira excels in facilitating collaboration among team members and providing real-time visibility into project progress.

In conclusion, Microsoft Project is best suited for large-scale, complex projects requiring detailed planning and scheduling. In contrast, Jira is ideal for agile teams needing flexibility, collaboration, and real-time tracking.

Asana is better at support than Microsoft Project: 4.5 vs 4.0

Asana is more user friendly than Microsoft Project: 4.5 vs 4.0

Asana is better at value for money than Microsoft Project: 4.4 vs 4.1

I find Microsoft Project to be a great alternative to Asana, especially for complex and large-scale projects. It offers advanced project management tools that cater to the needs of businesses of all sizes. The platform provides comprehensive features such as Gantt charts, project timelines, and critical path scheduling which are crucial for detailed project planning. Furthermore, it allows seamless integration with other Microsoft products like Excel, SharePoint, and Teams which enhances collaboration and productivity. Its robust reporting features provide valuable insights into project performance and progress. While Asana is fantastic for task management and team collaboration, Microsoft Project stands out when it comes to detailed project planning and management.

Comparing these 2 applications, I can say that Microsoft Project and Asana, while both project management tools, offer different features and experiences. Microsoft Project is a traditional project management tool known for its comprehensive suite of features, including detailed project planning capabilities, resource management, and advanced reporting tools. It's ideal for large businesses handling complex projects. However, it has a steep learning curve and can be overwhelming for beginners.

Asana, on the other hand, is user-friendly with a clean, intuitive interface. It offers task management, team collaboration features, and basic project tracking capabilities. Asana is great for small to medium-sized teams needing a straightforward tool to manage tasks and track progress. However, it lacks the in-depth project planning and resource management features of Microsoft Project.

Monday is a better solution for customer support than Microsoft Project: 4.7 vs 4.0

Monday is better at ease to use than Microsoft Project: 4.8 vs 4.0

Monday is better at value for money than Microsoft Project: 4.4 vs 4.1

Excel has better positive reviews than Microsoft Project: 98 vs 90

Excel is better at customer support than Microsoft Project: 4.3 vs 4.0

Excel is better at ease to use than Microsoft Project: 4.3 vs 4.0

Excel is better at value for money than Microsoft Project: 4.6 vs 4.1

Microsoft Project is more versatile than Excel: 40 vs 15

ClickUp is a better solution for customer support than Microsoft Project: 4.8 vs 4.0

ClickUp is better at ease to use than Microsoft Project: 4.8 vs 4.0

ClickUp is better at value for money than Microsoft Project: 4.6 vs 4.1

Microsoft Project has better positive reviews than Wrike: 90 vs 85

Wrike is better at customer support than Microsoft Project: 4.5 vs 4.0

Microsoft Project is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Wrike: 4.1 vs 4.0

Wrike has more options than Microsoft Project: 409 vs 40

Adobe Workfront is better at support than Microsoft Project: 4.5 vs 4.0

Adobe Workfront has more options than Microsoft Project: 142 vs 40

Microsoft Project has better positive reviews compared to Mavenlink: 90 vs 84

Mavenlink is better at customer service than Microsoft Project: 4.2 vs 4.0

Microsoft Project pricing plans are more competitive than Mavenlink: 4.1 vs 4.0

Mavenlink is better at number of features than Microsoft Project: 136 vs 40

Microsoft Project is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than ProjectManager.com: 90 vs 80

Microsoft Project is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than ProjectManager.com: 4.1 vs 3.7

ProjectManager.com has more features than Microsoft Project: 144 vs 40

I find ProjectManager.com to be a great alternative to Microsoft Project because of its user-friendly interface and cost-effectiveness. Unlike Microsoft Project, which can be complex for beginners, ProjectManager.com has a simple and intuitive design that can be easily navigated by all team members. In addition, it offers real-time data updates which ensures everyone is always on the same page. This software also provides a range of tools such as Gantt charts, task lists and time tracking features that streamline project management. Additionally, it's cloud-based which means you can access your projects anywhere, anytime. In terms of cost, ProjectManager.com offers flexible pricing plans suitable for different company sizes and needs. Hence, if you're looking for an accessible, affordable, and comprehensive project management tool, ProjectManager.com is worth considering.

As a user, I've noticed several differences between ProjectManager.com and Microsoft Project. Microsoft Project, primarily a desktop application, is powerful but can be complex and overwhelming for new users. It offers detailed project planning features but lacks real-time collaboration tools. On the other hand, ProjectManager.com is a cloud-based project management software that provides real-time data and collaboration tools. It's more user-friendly and accessible from anywhere at any time. Although it might not offer as many detailed planning features as Microsoft Project, it provides comprehensive tools for planning, tracking, and reporting. In terms of pricing, ProjectManager.com has a more straightforward subscription model while Microsoft Project can be expensive with its licensing model. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the specific needs of your project team.

Microsoft Project is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Zoho Projects: 90 vs 85

Zoho Projects is better at value for money than Microsoft Project: 4.2 vs 4.1

Zoho Projects is more versatile than Microsoft Project: 129 vs 40

Microsoft Project is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Planview: 90 vs 69

Microsoft Project is easier to set up than Planview: 4.0 vs 3.4

Microsoft Project is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Planview: 4.1 vs 3.6

Planview is better at number of features than Microsoft Project: 62 vs 40

I believe Planview is a good alternative to Microsoft Project because it provides a more comprehensive view of project management. Unlike Microsoft Project, Planview allows for strategic planning, portfolio and resource management, and even product innovation, offering a holistic approach to project management. It also offers robust collaboration tools that make team communication more efficient. With its real-time visibility feature, it's easier to monitor the progress of multiple projects and make necessary adjustments on the fly. Additionally, it's cloud-based, making it accessible from anywhere, unlike Microsoft Project that requires installation. Furthermore, Planview is user-friendly with an intuitive interface that simplifies the learning curve for new users. Overall, Planview provides a more versatile and comprehensive solution for managing projects.

As a user of both Planview and Microsoft Project, I've noticed several key differences. Planview is an enterprise-level project portfolio management tool that provides a comprehensive view of your organization's strategy, investments, and outcomes. It's designed for large-scale projects involving multiple teams and departments. It offers features like resource management, financial planning, and strategic planning.

Microsoft Project, In a slightly different way, is a project management software that's more suited for small to medium-sized projects. It has strong scheduling capabilities and is excellent for creating project timelines and Gantt charts. However, it lacks the strategic planning and portfolio management features found in Planview.

In terms of user experience, Planview leans more towards the complex side due to its extensive features, while Microsoft Project is relatively easier to use. Lastly, pricing varies with Planview being more expensive due to its enterprise-level capabilities.

Clearpoint strategy is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Microsoft Project: 100 vs 90

Clearpoint strategy is a better solution for customer support than Microsoft Project: 5.0 vs 4.0

Clearpoint strategy's user interface is more convenient than Microsoft Project: 4.5 vs 4.0

Clearpoint strategy pricing plans are more competitive than Microsoft Project: 4.8 vs 4.1

Clearpoint strategy has more functions than Microsoft Project: 80 vs 40

Wipster has better positive reviews than Microsoft Project: 100 vs 90

Wipster is better at customer support than Microsoft Project: 5.0 vs 4.0

Wipster's user interface is more convenient than Microsoft Project: 5.0 vs 4.0

Wipster pricing plans are more competitive than Microsoft Project: 4.3 vs 4.1

Microsoft Project has more options than Wipster: 40 vs 39