10 Best Alternatives to Alchemer in December 2024

SurveyMonkey has better positive reviews than Alchemer: 94 vs 89

SurveyMonkey is better at customer support than Alchemer: 4.7 vs 4.5

SurveyMonkey is better at ease to use than Alchemer: 4.7 vs 4.5

SurveyMonkey is better at value for money than Alchemer: 4.5 vs 3.8

Alchemer has more options than SurveyMonkey: 105 vs 94

I have found Alchemer to be a great alternative to SurveyMonkey for several reasons. Firstly, Alchemer offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes it easy for anyone to create, distribute, and analyze surveys. Secondly, Alchemer has a more flexible pricing plan. It allows you to choose from different packages based on your specific needs, which can save you money in the long run. Thirdly, Alchemer provides more advanced features such as logic and branching, quota management, and text analysis. These can help you gain deeper insights from your survey data. Finally, Alchemer offers excellent customer support with quick response times. This can be extremely helpful if you encounter any issues or need assistance with your surveys.

As a user of both Alchemer and SurveyMonkey, I've noticed several key differences. Firstly, Alchemer, formerly known as SurveyGizmo, offers more advanced question types and logic functionality. It's ideal for complex surveys and research projects where deep data analysis is required. In contrast, SurveyMonkey is more user-friendly and navigable with a simpler interface, making it perfect for basic surveys.

Secondly, Alchemer provides more flexibility in terms of survey design customization. You can change the look and feel of your survey to match your brand. SurveyMonkey, however, has limited customization options but it does offer pre-designed templates which are easy to use.

Lastly, pricing differs between the two. Alchemer's pricing is more expensive than SurveyMonkey's due to its advanced features. So depending on the complexity of your survey needs and budget, you can choose between these two platforms.

Qualtrics employeexm has better positive reviews than Alchemer: 97 vs 89

Qualtrics employeexm is better at value for money than Alchemer: 4.2 vs 3.8

Alchemer is more versatile than Qualtrics employeexm: 105 vs 63

I found Alchemer to be a great alternative to Qualtrics-EmployeeXM primarily due to its flexible and user-friendly interface. Unlike Qualtrics, Alchemer offers customizable templates and a wide range of question types which makes it easier to create surveys that fit my specific needs. Moreover, Alchemer also stands out with its robust reporting features, enabling me to analyze results in real-time and make data-driven decisions swiftly. The pricing is also more affordable compared to Qualtrics, making it a cost-effective choice for small to medium businesses like mine. Additionally, Alchemer’s customer support has been commendable, providing timely assistance whenever needed. Thus, for its flexibility, affordability, and strong support system, I consider Alchemer a good alternative to Qualtrics-EmployeeXM.

I have researched and found that Alchemer and Qualtrics EmployeeXM are both powerful software for collecting and analyzing data, but they differ in several ways. Alchemer, formerly known as SurveyGizmo, offers a wide range of data collection tools for businesses of all sizes. It allows users to customize surveys, conduct market research, and analyze results. On the other hand, Qualtrics EmployeeXM is specifically designed for employee engagement surveys. It provides real-time insights into employee experiences and helps organizations to improve their work culture. Also, Qualtrics EmployeeXM has more advanced analysis features such as predictive intelligence and trend analysis. Moreover, Alchemer's pricing is more affordable compared to Qualtrics EmployeeXM which targets enterprise-level companies.

I find Alchemer to be a great alternative to Typeform due to its impressive array of features and intuitive interface. Where Typeform excels in simplicity, Alchemer provides more advanced functionality. For instance, Alchemer offers more question types and page logic options, allowing me to create more complex and highly customizable surveys. It also has robust reporting and data analysis tools that go beyond what Typeform offers, making it easier for me to interpret the results and make data-driven decisions. Additionally, Alchemer allows for seamless integration with other platforms like Salesforce and Tableau, which can be incredibly beneficial for businesses. While Typeform might be more user-friendly for beginners, Alchemer is a powerful tool that can cater to the needs of both small businesses and large enterprises.

I have used both Alchemer and Typeform for various projects and I've noticed several differences between them. Alchemer, formerly known as SurveyGizmo, offers more advanced features for enterprise-level surveys. It provides a wide variety of question types, logic, and customization options. Its strength lies in its ability to handle complex survey needs.

Conversely, Typeform is known for its user-friendly interface and aesthetic appeal. It makes creating and taking surveys a visually pleasing experience. It's ideal for simpler surveys where user engagement is a priority. However, it may not be the best choice for more complex or long-form surveys due to its linear, one-question-at-a-time format.

So, Alchemer is more suited for comprehensive research studies while Typeform excels at customer engagement and feedback collection.

Alchemer is better at support than SurveySparrow: 4.5 vs 4.4

Alchemer is easy to use compared to SurveySparrow: 4.5 vs 4.4

SurveySparrow pricing plans are more competitive than Alchemer: 4.3 vs 3.8

Alchemer has better positive reviews than Formstack forms: 89 vs 82

Alchemer is better at customer support than Formstack forms: 4.5 vs 3.7

Alchemer is easier to set up than Formstack forms: 4.5 vs 4.1

Formstack forms is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Alchemer: 3.9 vs 3.8

Alchemer is better at number of features than Formstack forms: 105 vs 77

Alchemer has better positive reviews than Survicate: 89 vs 86

Alchemer pricing plans are more competitive than Survicate: 3.8 vs 3.7

Alchemer has more features than Survicate: 105 vs 73

Alchemer is better at customer support than Jotform: 4.5 vs 4.4

Jotform's user interface is more convenient than Alchemer: 4.6 vs 4.5

Jotform pricing plans are more competitive than Alchemer: 4.5 vs 3.8

BlockSurvey has more positive reviews than Alchemer: 100 vs 89

BlockSurvey is better at support than Alchemer: 4.9 vs 4.5

BlockSurvey is easier to use than Alchemer: 4.8 vs 4.5

BlockSurvey is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Alchemer: 4.9 vs 3.8

Alchemer has more options than BlockSurvey: 105 vs 26

Surveymonkey enterprise has better positive reviews compared to Alchemer: 92 vs 89

Alchemer is better at customer service than Surveymonkey enterprise: 4.5 vs 4.1

Surveymonkey enterprise pricing plans are more competitive than Alchemer: 4.1 vs 3.8

Alchemer has more functions than Surveymonkey enterprise: 105 vs 64