9 Best Alternatives to New Relic in November 2024

Sentry is better at customer service than New Relic: 4.5 vs 4.0

Sentry is more user friendly than New Relic: 4.5 vs 4.0

Sentry is better at value for money than New Relic: 4.6 vs 3.9

I believe New Relic is a good alternative to Sentry based on several factors. Firstly, New Relic provides a more comprehensive overview of the system's performance, not just error tracking. It offers an end-to-end view of your software stack, which means you can track everything from infrastructure health to user experience. Secondly, New Relic has robust alerting capabilities and dashboards that are easy to customize according to your needs. This makes it easier to monitor and troubleshoot issues in real-time. Lastly, New Relic supports a broader range of programming languages and platforms compared to Sentry. This makes it more adaptable and versatile for different development environments. While both tools have their strengths, New Relic's comprehensive monitoring capabilities make it a strong alternative to Sentry.

I have tested both New Relic and Sentry, and I can say that they serve different use cases, despite some overlap. New Relic is an application performance monitoring tool that provides insights on how your software is performing in real-time. It gives detailed information about your app's performance, including server response times, database query performance, and error rate. It's more oriented towards infrastructure monitoring.

On the side of the alternative, Sentry is an error tracking tool that helps developers detect, fix, and optimize the performance of their code. It's more focused on code-level issues and provides detailed error reports with stack traces. While New Relic also offers error tracking, it doesn’t provide as detailed information as Sentry does. Therefore, if you want a deep dive into your code's errors, Sentry is the better option. However, if you're more interested in broader application and infrastructure monitoring, New Relic would be the better choice.

Splunk enterprise is a better solution for customer support than New Relic: 4.5 vs 4.0

Splunk enterprise is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than New Relic: 4.3 vs 3.9

I believe New Relic is a good alternative to Splunk Enterprise due to several reasons. Firstly, New Relic provides real-time insights into the performance of web applications. It offers a user-friendly interface that makes it easy to track and understand application performance data. Secondly, New Relic's pricing model is more flexible and affordable compared to Splunk, making it an ideal choice for small and medium-sized businesses. Thirdly, New Relic offers seamless integration with a variety of platforms including cloud, mobile, and on-premise environments, providing a comprehensive view of the entire system. Lastly, with its proactive alerting system, New Relic helps teams to identify and solve issues before they affect users. Therefore, for businesses seeking cost-effective application performance monitoring with real-time insights, New Relic is a worthy alternative to Splunk Enterprise.

I have used both New Relic and Splunk Enterprise, and I find that they serve different objectives within the IT landscape. New Relic is an application performance management tool primarily used for monitoring and troubleshooting software applications. It provides real-time data about your software's performance and user experiences. It is especially useful for teams working on web applications, as it helps to identify bottlenecks in the code.

On the other hand, Splunk Enterprise is a log management tool that collects, stores, and indexes all kinds of machine-generated data from various sources. It allows you to search, analyze, and visualize this data to monitor system performance, investigate security incidents, and troubleshoot issues. While New Relic focuses on application performance, Splunk provides a broader view of your entire IT infrastructure.

Logrocket is better at support than New Relic: 5.0 vs 4.0

Logrocket is easier to use than New Relic: 4.5 vs 4.0

Logrocket is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than New Relic: 4.3 vs 3.9

I believe New Relic is a good alternative to LogRocket due to several reasons. Firstly, New Relic provides a comprehensive APM (Application Performance Monitoring) service that offers real-time monitoring of your apps, databases, and servers. This allows you to identify and resolve issues before they affect your users. Secondly, it provides detailed insights into how your applications are performing in production, which helps to optimize performance and improve user experience. Thirdly, New Relic's intuitive dashboard makes it easy to understand and analyze data, thus simplifying the troubleshooting process. Additionally, New Relic supports more languages and platforms compared to LogRocket, providing greater flexibility. Lastly, while LogRocket focuses more on front-end issues, New Relic provides full-stack observability, making it a more complete solution for managing application performance.

I have been using both New Relic and LogRocket, and I've found that while both are powerful tools for application monitoring, they serve different purposes. New Relic focuses on backend performance, providing insights into server load, database queries, and service interactions. It's a robust tool for DevOps and back-end developers looking to monitor system health and optimize performance.

In a slightly different way, LogRocket is more focused on front-end performance tracking. It allows you to replay problematic sessions in your web app, see network requests/responses with headers + bodies, console logs, browser metadata, and much more. This makes it invaluable for front-end developers and UX designers who need to understand user behavior and troubleshoot UI issues.

In essence, New Relic is about server-side monitoring while LogRocket is about client-side monitoring.

Mixpanel pricing plans are more competitive than New Relic: 4.0 vs 3.9

Datadog is better at customer service than New Relic: 4.8 vs 4.0

Datadog is more user friendly than New Relic: 4.8 vs 4.0

Datadog is better at value for money than New Relic: 4.5 vs 3.9

Dotcom-Monitor is a better solution for customer support than New Relic: 4.6 vs 4.0

Dotcom-Monitor is easier to set up than New Relic: 4.5 vs 4.0

Dotcom-Monitor is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than New Relic: 4.2 vs 3.9

Slido is a better solution for customer support than New Relic: 4.7 vs 4.0

Slido's user interface is more convenient than New Relic: 4.8 vs 4.0

Slido pricing plans are more competitive than New Relic: 4.6 vs 3.9

Sematext cloud is better at customer service than New Relic: 4.5 vs 4.0

Sematext cloud is more user friendly than New Relic: 4.5 vs 4.0

Sematext cloud is better at value for money than New Relic: 4.6 vs 3.9

Pandora fms is better at support than New Relic: 4.5 vs 4.0

Pandora fms is easier to use than New Relic: 4.5 vs 4.0

Pandora fms is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than New Relic: 4.5 vs 3.9