7 Best Alternatives to Pulseway in November 2024

Pulseway has more positive reviews than Atera: 97 vs 95

Pulseway is more versatile than Atera: 163 vs 131

I believe Pulseway is a great alternative to Atera because it provides comprehensive IT system management functionality that is accessible from any device at any time. Unlike Atera, Pulseway offers real-time status updates and system resources monitoring, which enables quick reaction to any issues that may arise. It also has a more user-friendly interface, making it easier to navigate and manage tasks.

Pulseway’s robust automation capabilities stand out as well. It allows you to automate routine tasks, thus saving time and reducing the chance of errors. Additionally, it offers more comprehensive integrations with third-party applications compared to Atera. The ability to customize alerts and reports also adds to its appeal. Therefore, if you're looking for a versatile, reliable, and efficient IT management solution, Pulseway could be the better choice.

As a user of both Pulseway and Atera, I've noticed several differences between the two. First, Pulseway is primarily a mobile-first remote monitoring and management (RMM) tool, allowing you to control your systems from anywhere. It's highly customizable and provides real-time updates. However, its user interface can be a bit complex for new users.

Atera, On the side of the alternative, is more than just an RMM. It's an all-in-one platform that includes professional services automation (PSA), remote access and support, reporting, billing, and more. Its interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier to navigate for beginners. However, its mobile functionality isn't as robust as Pulseway's.

Essentially, if you're looking for a mobile-first RMM solution with deep customization options, Pulseway might be your choice. But if you want an all-in-one solution with a simpler interface and additional features beyond RMM, Atera would be a better fit.

As an IT professional, I find Pulseway to be a great alternative to Kaseya. Pulseway's user-friendly interface and real-time notifications make it easier to manage and monitor networks, servers, and systems remotely. Unlike Kaseya, Pulseway doesn't require extensive setup or training, making it a more convenient option for smaller teams or individual users. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools including patch management, remote desktop, and automation. Moreover, Pulseway's pricing is more flexible with its pay-as-you-go model, which can be a favorable option for businesses with budget constraints. The mobile app is another huge plus, allowing IT admins to respond to critical issues anytime, anywhere. While Kaseya has its strengths, I believe Pulseway's simplicity, cost-effectiveness and mobile-first approach make it a strong contender in the remote monitoring and management field.

Comparing the two, I noticed that Pulseway and Kaseya are both robust IT management solutions, but they have some key differences. Pulseway stands out for its strong mobile capabilities, allowing IT admins to monitor and manage systems from anywhere using their mobile devices. It's also known for its intuitive and user-friendly interface.

On the other hand, Kaseya is often preferred for larger-scale operations due to its extensive automation capabilities and wide range of integrated tools. It offers more advanced features like patch management, network monitoring, and remote control. However, it may have a steeper learning curve compared to Pulseway.

Ultimately, the choice between Pulseway and Kaseya depends on your specific needs. If you require on-the-go access and simplicity, Pulseway may be better. If you need a comprehensive toolset with deep automation capabilities, then Kaseya could be the right choice.

Pulseway has more positive reviews than Teamviewer meeting: 97 vs 89

Pulseway is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Teamviewer meeting: 4.7 vs 4.5

Pulseway has more functions than Teamviewer meeting: 163 vs 31

I believe Pulseway is a great alternative to TeamViewer-Meeting because of its robust and flexible features. Unlike TeamViewer, which is primarily focused on remote desktop access and meetings, Pulseway offers a more comprehensive IT management solution. It allows me to monitor and control all my IT systems from any device, making it particularly useful for managing large networks of computers or servers.

With Pulseway, I can manage system resources, run commands, access the terminal, view system performance data, and much more. It also has automation capabilities, making routine tasks easier. Moreover, it provides real-time status updates and alerts about critical issues which helps in proactive problem-solving.

While TeamViewer-Meeting is excellent for remote meetings and access, Pulseway's broader range of features makes it a more versatile tool for IT management. Its user-friendly interface and efficient functionality make it an excellent choice for many businesses.

I have found several key differences between Pulseway and TeamViewer Meeting. Firstly, Pulseway is essentially a Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) software that allows IT administrators to monitor and manage systems remotely. It provides features for system automation, patch management, and network monitoring, among others. In a slightly different way, TeamViewer Meeting is a software primarily designed for online meetings, web conferencing, and desktop sharing. It allows users to collaborate with colleagues, hold webinars, or provide remote support.

Secondly, while both offer remote access capabilities, Pulseway's focus is more on managing and controlling systems remotely, whereas TeamViewer Meeting emphasizes collaboration and communication. Lastly, TeamViewer Meeting is more geared towards businesses of all sizes needing remote communication solutions while Pulseway is more tailored towards IT professionals needing system management capabilities.

Pulseway has better positive reviews compared to Slack: 97 vs 95

Pulseway pricing plans are more competitive than Slack: 4.7 vs 4.6

Pulseway has more functions than Slack: 163 vs 78

Ninjaone is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Pulseway: 98 vs 97

Ninjaone is a better solution for customer support than Pulseway: 4.8 vs 4.5

Ninjaone is easier to set up than Pulseway: 4.8 vs 4.5

Pulseway is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Ninjaone: 4.7 vs 4.6

Pulseway has more options than Ninjaone: 163 vs 98

I believe NinjaOne is a great alternative to Pulseway due to its extensive features and flexibility. NinjaOne offers comprehensive network monitoring, which includes not only computers but also servers and other network devices. This is beneficial for businesses with a large network infrastructure as it ensures all devices are performing optimally.

Additionally, NinjaOne provides robust automation capabilities. Routine tasks can be automated, reducing the workload for IT teams and minimizing human error. The platform also has excellent integration capabilities, allowing it to work seamlessly with other tools such as ticketing systems and CRM software.

Despite its advanced features, NinjaOne retains a user-friendly interface, making it accessible for all users regardless of technical expertise. This ease of use combined with its powerful capabilities makes NinjaOne a compelling alternative to Pulseway.

I used both NinjaOne and Pulseway, and I have noticed several differences between the two. Firstly, NinjaOne is a unified IT operations software that offers features like IT asset management, network management, and patch management. It's designed for managing network devices like servers, printers, switches, and also provides vulnerability scanning.

In a slightly different way, Pulseway is a remote monitoring and management (RMM) solution designed specifically for mobile and desktop devices. It offers real-time status, system resources, logged in users, network performance, Windows updates, and more. One unique feature of Pulseway is its mobile-first approach which allows full control from a smartphone or tablet.

In short, while both are powerful tools for IT management, NinjaOne offers a broader range of capabilities for device types and network management whereas Pulseway focuses more on mobile and desktop device management with real-time updates.

Altaro vm backup is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Pulseway: 98 vs 97

Altaro vm backup is a better solution for customer support than Pulseway: 4.8 vs 4.5

Altaro vm backup's user interface is more convenient than Pulseway: 4.8 vs 4.5

Pulseway has more features than Altaro vm backup: 163 vs 62

Pulseway has better positive reviews compared to Datto siris: 97 vs 89

Pulseway pricing plans are more competitive than Datto siris: 4.7 vs 4.2

Pulseway is more versatile than Datto siris: 163 vs 41