24 Best Alternatives to Figma in November 2024

Canva has more features than Figma: 67 vs 23

I find Figma a great alternative to Canva due to its advanced and flexible features. Unlike Canva, Figma offers real-time collaboration, allowing multiple team members to work on the same design simultaneously. This feature makes it an ideal choice for large-scale projects and team-based work. Additionally, Figma provides a comprehensive set of design tools that are more sophisticated compared to Canva. It allows for vector editing, prototyping, and even code generation which is beneficial for web designing.

Furthermore, Figma has a robust system of components and styles, making it easier to maintain consistency across designs. It also offers better control over elements like typography and color. While Canva is user-friendly and sufficient for basic designs, Figma's extensive features cater to professional designers who require more flexibility and control in their work.

I use both Figma and Canva for different uses. Figma is a powerful design tool used primarily for user interface and user experience design. It allows for real-time collaboration, making it great for team projects. Figma's vector-based system allows for precise control over elements, making it ideal for detailed design work.

On the other hand, Canva is a graphic design platform more suited to creating social media graphics, presentations, posters, and other visual content. It's not as detailed as Figma but it's simpler to use with its drag-and-drop feature and large library of templates. Canva also offers stock images, fonts, and illustrations within the platform itself.

In summary, while both are excellent tools in their own right, Figma is more specialized for UI/UX design and team collaboration whereas Canva is more geared towards simpler graphic designs and content creation.

Figma has better positive reviews than Photoshop: 97 vs 95

Photoshop is better at customer support than Figma: 4.6 vs 4.5

Photoshop is easier to set up than Figma: 4.7 vs 4.5

Photoshop is more versatile than Figma: 70 vs 23

I find Figma to be an excellent alternative to Photoshop due to its collaborative nature. Unlike Photoshop, Figma allows multiple users to work on a design simultaneously in real-time, which is a significant advantage for team projects. It operates in the cloud, meaning you can access your work from any device without needing to install software or worry about version control. Additionally, Figma is designed specifically for UX/UI design and includes features such as prototyping and developer handoff tools, which aren't available in Photoshop. It's also more intuitive and easier to learn than Photoshop. While Photoshop remains a powerful tool for photo editing and graphic design, I believe Figma offers superior functionality for digital product design.

I have used both Figma and Photoshop, and they each have unique features that make them suitable for different types of design work. Photoshop, a product of Adobe, is a raster graphics editor that's great for photo editing and creating detailed illustrations. It's a standalone software that requires installation on your computer. However, it lacks real-time collaboration features.

For its part, Figma is a cloud-based vector graphics editor and prototyping tool that allows multiple users to collaborate on projects in real time. It's ideal for user interface and user experience design as it provides tools to create interactive prototypes. Unlike Photoshop, Figma doesn't require installation and can be used directly in the web browser. However, it might not be the best choice for detailed photo editing or complex illustrations.

Figma has better positive reviews than Illustrator: 97 vs 95

Illustrator is better at customer support than Figma: 4.6 vs 4.5

Illustrator is better at ease to use than Figma: 4.7 vs 4.5

Illustrator is better at number of features than Figma: 70 vs 23

I believe Figma is a great alternative to Illustrator for several reasons. Firstly, Figma is a cloud-based tool which allows for real-time collaboration. This means multiple team members can work on the same project simultaneously, making it ideal for team projects. Secondly, Figma offers a user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate even for beginners. It also provides a wide range of design tools and features that are comparable to those in Illustrator. Thirdly, Figma is more affordable than Illustrator, making it a cost-effective choice for startups and small businesses. Lastly, Figma's prototyping capabilities are superior to Illustrator's, allowing designers to create interactive prototypes without needing to switch to another tool. Therefore, for its collaborative features, user-friendliness, affordability, and advanced prototyping capabilities, I find Figma to be a compelling alternative to Illustrator.

I have used both Figma and Illustrator and found that they have distinct features and uses. Figma is a cloud-based design tool, which makes it excellent for collaborative work. Multiple users can access and edit a design simultaneously, making it ideal for team projects. It also has prototyping capabilities, which are useful for designing user interfaces and experiences.

On the other hand, Illustrator is a vector-based design tool from Adobe. It's perfect for creating logos, illustrations, and graphics. It offers more advanced tools for graphic creation and manipulation than Figma. However, Illustrator lacks the real-time collaboration feature of Figma and is not as user-friendly for UI/UX design.

In summary, while both are powerful design tools, Figma is better suited for collaborative UI/UX design, while Illustrator excels in creating complex vector graphics.

I find Miro to be a great alternative to Figma because it offers unique features that cater to different needs. While Figma is primarily focused on UI/UX design, Miro provides a broader spectrum of tools for brainstorming, mind mapping, agile methodologies, and more. This makes Miro an excellent tool for collaboration and project planning across various teams. Furthermore, Miro's infinite canvas allows for unlimited space to visualize and connect ideas, making it perfect for large projects. Also, the real-time collaboration feature ensures everyone on the team can contribute simultaneously, fostering a more inclusive and dynamic work environment. Lastly, Miro's integration with popular apps like Slack, Google Suite, and Dropbox increases its versatility. Therefore, while both platforms have their strengths, Miro's extensive functionality makes it a worthy alternative to Figma.

As a user, I find Visme to be a great alternative to Figma due to several reasons. Firstly, Visme offers a more intuitive and user-friendly interface which makes it easier for beginners to start designing without any prior experience. Secondly, Visme provides a wide range of pre-designed templates that can be easily customized, saving time and effort in creating designs from scratch. Thirdly, unlike Figma, Visme is not just limited to UI/UX design but also allows creating infographics, presentations, social media graphics and more. Lastly, Visme offers robust collaboration features that make it easy for teams to work together on projects. Therefore, for those looking for an all-in-one design tool with an easy learning curve, Visme is a solid choice.

As a user of both Visme and Figma, I've noticed several key differences between the two. Visme is primarily a design tool for creating presentations, infographics, and other visual content. It offers a wide range of templates and assets, making it easy for non-designers to create professional-looking visuals. On the other hand, Figma is a more advanced tool that's used for UI/UX design. It allows multiple users to collaborate in real-time and has robust features for creating interactive prototypes. While Visme focuses on simplicity and ease-of-use, Figma offers more complex functionality for detailed design work. Therefore, the choice between the two largely depends on your specific needs: if you're looking to create simple visuals or presentations, Visme might be the better choice; but if you're working on app or website design, Figma would be more suitable.

PandaSuite is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Figma: 100 vs 97

PandaSuite is a better solution for customer support than Figma: 4.8 vs 4.5

PandaSuite's user interface is more convenient than Figma: 4.7 vs 4.5

Figma has more functions than PandaSuite: 23 vs 10

InDesign is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Figma: 100 vs 97

Figma is a better solution for customer support than InDesign: 4.5 vs 4.2

Figma's user interface is more convenient than InDesign: 4.5 vs 4.1

Figma pricing plans are more competitive than InDesign: 4.6 vs 4.2

InDesign is more versatile than Figma: 24 vs 23

Figma has more positive reviews than Lucidchart: 97 vs 95

Figma is better at support than Lucidchart: 4.5 vs 4.3

Figma is easy to use compared to Lucidchart: 4.5 vs 4.4

Figma pricing plans are more competitive than Lucidchart: 4.6 vs 4.4

Lucidchart has more options than Figma: 69 vs 23

I find Lucidchart to be a great alternative to Figma because it offers a range of features that cater to different needs. Lucidchart is not just a design tool, but also an effective diagramming software. It provides a variety of templates for flowcharts, network diagrams, org charts, and more, which can be particularly useful for project planning and management. Additionally, it supports real-time collaboration, allowing teams to work together seamlessly regardless of their location.

Lucidchart’s intuitive interface makes it easy to use even for beginners. While Figma excels in prototyping and design collaboration, Lucidchart shines in its versatility and ease of use in creating complex diagrams. Furthermore, Lucidchart integrates well with popular apps like Google Docs and Slack which enhances its convenience and efficiency. Therefore, depending on the specific requirements of a project, Lucidchart can often be a more suitable choice than Figma.

I've found that Lucidchart and Figma, though both excellent design tools, serve different goals. Lucidchart is primarily used for creating diagrams such as flowcharts, organizational charts, and mind maps. It’s a great tool for visualizing processes or concepts in a straightforward and professional manner. On the other hand, Figma is a UI/UX design application that allows for real-time collaboration. It's used mainly for designing interfaces for websites and apps, allowing multiple users to work on the same project simultaneously.

Additionally, Figma provides prototyping capabilities which Lucidchart does not offer. This means you can create interactive mockups of your design right within the tool. However, Lucidchart excels in creating static diagrams with ease of use. The choice between the two would largely depend on the specific needs of your project.

Figma has more positive reviews than InVision: 97 vs 95

Figma is better at support than InVision: 4.5 vs 4.4

Figma is more user friendly than InVision: 4.5 vs 4.4

Figma is better at value for money than InVision: 4.6 vs 4.3

InVision is more versatile than Figma: 54 vs 23

Figma pricing plans are more competitive than Lucidspark: 4.6 vs 4.4

Lucidspark has more functions than Figma: 115 vs 23

I find Lucidspark a great alternative to Figma due to its unique features and user-friendly interface. Unlike Figma, which is primarily a design tool, Lucidspark offers a virtual whiteboard that allows for real-time collaboration, brainstorming, and idea mapping. This makes it an excellent tool for team-based projects and brainstorming sessions. It also provides a wide range of templates, making it easier to start a project from scratch. Additionally, Lucidspark integrates seamlessly with other popular tools like Slack, Google Drive, and Jira, enhancing its functionality and convenience. Its voting feature is another standout, allowing teams to easily prioritize ideas. While Figma excels in design-specific tasks, Lucidspark's versatility makes it a strong contender for those seeking a more comprehensive collaboration tool.

I have used both Lucidspark and Figma, and I've found that they serve different purposes. Lucidspark is a virtual whiteboard that facilitates brainstorming and collaboration. It's ideal for mind mapping, designing workflows, and organizing ideas visually. It offers real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on the same board simultaneously.

On the other hand, Figma is a design tool used for interface design, prototyping, and graphic design. It's primarily used by UX/UI designers to create interactive prototypes for web and mobile applications. Figma also supports real-time collaboration, but its features are more focused on design elements like typography, color schemes, and layout grids.

In summary, while both tools offer collaborative features, Lucidspark is more suited for brainstorming and planning, whereas Figma is designed for creating detailed and interactive design prototypes.

Figma is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Tree plotter inventory: 97 vs 94

Tree plotter inventory is a better solution for customer support than Figma: 5.0 vs 4.5

Figma is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Tree plotter inventory: 4.6 vs 4.4

Tree plotter inventory has more functions than Figma: 46 vs 23

As a designer, I find Tree Plotter Inventory a compelling alternative to Figma mainly due to its unique features designed for specific tasks. Unlike Figma, which is a general-purpose design tool, Tree Plotter is specialized for managing and visualizing tree inventories. This makes it an excellent choice for urban foresters, arborists, or anyone working with large amounts of tree data.

Tree Plotter allows users to map, manage, analyze and report data in real-time. Its user-friendly interface and interactive maps make it easy to navigate and understand complex datasets. Moreover, it offers cloud-based access which means I can access my work from anywhere at any time. It also supports collaboration among multiple users which is a key feature in today's remote working environment.

In short, Tree Plotter Inventory provides a more tailored solution for tree inventory management compared to Figma's broad design functionalities.

As a designer, I find both Tree Plotter Inventory and Figma to be valuable tools, but they serve very different purposes. Tree Plotter Inventory is a web-based software specifically designed for tree inventory management. It allows arborists and urban foresters to map, manage, and analyze tree populations. The software provides features like real-time updates, data collection, customizable fields and dashboards, and GIS mapping.

On the other side, Figma is a cloud-based design tool used for user interface and user experience design, as well as prototyping. It's a collaborative platform that allows multiple team members to work on a design simultaneously. With Figma, designers can create wireframes, interactive prototypes, and gather feedback all in one place. So while both are powerful tools, they cater to very different needs - one is focused on tree management while the other facilitates digital product design.

Figma is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Mystudio: 97 vs 89

Figma is better at ease to use than Mystudio: 4.5 vs 4.0

Mystudio is more versatile than Figma: 109 vs 23

Whimsical has more positive reviews than Figma: 98 vs 97

Whimsical is easier to use than Figma: 5.0 vs 4.5

Figma has more features than Whimsical: 23 vs 8

Figma has better positive reviews compared to Moqups: 97 vs 96

Figma is better at customer service than Moqups: 4.5 vs 4.0

Figma is better at value for money than Moqups: 4.6 vs 4.1

Moqups has more options than Figma: 50 vs 23

Figma has more positive reviews than Proto.io: 97 vs 85

Figma is better at support than Proto.io: 4.5 vs 4.3

Figma is easy to use compared to Proto.io: 4.5 vs 4.3

Figma pricing plans are more competitive than Proto.io: 4.6 vs 4.0

Figma has more functions than Proto.io: 23 vs 13