10 Best Alternatives to Looker in December 2024

Tableau has more positive reviews than Looker: 95 vs 94

Looker is better at support than Tableau: 4.5 vs 4.0

Tableau has more functions than Looker: 138 vs 109

I believe Looker is a great alternative to Tableau for several reasons. First, Looker offers a data modeling layer that allows for a more in-depth and comprehensive understanding of your data. This feature makes it easier for analysts to define and manage their business metrics. Second, Looker's interface is user-friendly and intuitive, making it accessible for users with different levels of technical expertise. It also supports real-time collaboration, which enhances teamwork and productivity. Moreover, Looker's pricing is more flexible and cost-effective, especially for smaller businesses or startups. Lastly, Looker provides robust integration with other software systems like Google Cloud, Amazon Redshift, and Snowflake, making it a versatile tool for various business needs.

I have tested both Looker and Tableau for data visualization and found several differences between the two. Tableau is a more mature tool with a wider range of capabilities, particularly in terms of visualization. It allows for more complex and customized visualizations, making it ideal for organizations with specialized needs. On the side of the alternative, Looker is a newer tool that focuses on ease of use and collaboration. It offers a simpler interface and is easier to learn for beginners. Looker also has stronger capabilities in terms of data exploration, as it allows users to drill down into data directly from the dashboard. In contrast, Tableau requires users to create new worksheets for deeper data exploration. In terms of integration, Looker performs better with its ability to connect directly to your database, while Tableau requires data to be imported into its system.

Snowflake has better positive reviews compared to Looker: 96 vs 94

Looker is better at customer service than Snowflake: 4.5 vs 4.2

Snowflake is more user friendly than Looker: 4.5 vs 4.0

Looker has more features than Snowflake: 109 vs 28

As a data professional, I find Looker to be a great alternative to Snowflake. One of the key reasons is Looker's powerful data modeling layer, LookML. This feature simplifies the process of defining, transforming, and managing my data. It also allows me to create a unified and reusable business logic which ensures consistent metrics across my organization.

Another advantage is Looker's ability to integrate with any SQL database or data warehouse, offering flexibility and convenience. Furthermore, Looker's in-database architecture ensures that I'm working with real-time data, instead of extracts. This is a critical capability for making timely and accurate business decisions.

Lastly, Looker's user-friendly interface makes it accessible for users of all technical levels. Its robust visualization capabilities allow for easy interpretation and communication of data insights.

I find that Looker and Snowflake, while both powerful tools in the realm of data, serve fundamentally different objectives. Snowflake is a cloud-based data warehousing platform designed to handle large amounts of data and enable rapid analytics. It provides a flexible, scalable, and easy-to-use solution for data storage and computation. On the other hand, Looker is a business intelligence (BI) software that offers data exploration and discovery. It provides an interface for users to define metrics, create visualizations, and share reports.

Essentially, Snowflake is where you store and process your data, while Looker is how you analyze and visualize it. They can be used separately or together, depending on your needs. For instance, you might use Snowflake as your data warehouse and Looker as your BI tool to analyze the data stored in Snowflake.

Looker is a better solution for customer support than Qlik Sense: 4.5 vs 4.0

Qlik Sense's user interface is more convenient than Looker: 4.5 vs 4.0

I believe Looker is a good alternative to Qlik Sense for several reasons. First, Looker offers a more user-friendly interface that is simpler to navigate, especially for non-technical users. It also provides more robust and flexible data modeling capabilities, allowing users to define business metrics in a standardized way. This can significantly reduce the time and effort required to generate reports and dashboards.

Second, Looker's integration capabilities are superior. It can seamlessly integrate with various data sources and third-party applications, making it easier to consolidate and analyze data from different systems. In contrast, Qlik Sense's integration capabilities are somewhat limited.

Lastly, Looker's pricing model is more transparent and predictable than Qlik Sense's, which can be complex and confusing. Therefore, businesses can better manage their budget with Looker.

I have been exploring Looker and Qlik Sense, two powerful business intelligence tools. Looker is a data exploration platform that enables users to access, visualize and understand their data in a simple way. It uses an intuitive drag-and-drop interface and offers robust integration capabilities. Its unique modeling layer allows for flexible, governed and scalable data exploration.

In a slightly different way, Qlik Sense is a self-service data analysis and visualization tool. It's known for its associative data indexing engine which helps users discover trends and patterns that are not readily apparent. It offers interactive dashboards, conversational analytics, custom and embedded analytics. While Looker is great for businesses seeking a robust data platform with SQL capabilities, Qlik Sense is best for businesses looking for a user-friendly, interactive tool with strong data discovery features.

Microsoft Power BI has better positive reviews compared to Looker: 95 vs 94

Looker is better at customer service than Microsoft Power BI: 4.5 vs 4.0

Microsoft Power BI is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Looker: 4.5 vs 4.2

Looker has more options than Microsoft Power BI: 109 vs 37

Clari Copilot (ex. Wingman) has better positive reviews compared to Looker: 98 vs 94

Clari Copilot (ex. Wingman) is better at customer service than Looker: 4.7 vs 4.5

Clari Copilot (ex. Wingman) is easier to use than Looker: 4.8 vs 4.0

Clari Copilot (ex. Wingman) is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Looker: 4.7 vs 4.2

Looker is better at number of features than Clari Copilot (ex. Wingman): 109 vs 81

Bold bi has better positive reviews compared to Looker: 100 vs 94

Bold bi is better at customer service than Looker: 5.0 vs 4.5

Bold bi is easier to use than Looker: 4.5 vs 4.0

Bold bi is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Looker: 4.7 vs 4.2

Looker is better at number of features than Bold bi: 109 vs 66

GoSquared has more positive reviews than Looker: 96 vs 94

GoSquared is better at support than Looker: 5.0 vs 4.5

GoSquared is easier to use than Looker: 4.5 vs 4.0

GoSquared is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Looker: 4.7 vs 4.2

Looker is better at number of features than GoSquared: 109 vs 26

Looker is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than MaRS Market Intelligence: 94 vs 85

MaRS Market Intelligence is a better solution for customer support than Looker: 4.6 vs 4.5

MaRS Market Intelligence is easier to set up than Looker: 4.5 vs 4.0

MaRS Market Intelligence is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Looker: 4.4 vs 4.2

Looker is better at number of features than MaRS Market Intelligence: 109 vs 52