15 Best Alternatives to InVision in November 2024

I find InVision to be a great alternative to Miro primarily because of its interactive prototyping feature. This tool allows me to create highly dynamic, clickable prototypes that closely simulate the final product, which is incredibly helpful in user testing and presentations. InVision also offers seamless integration with design tools like Sketch and Adobe XD, making it easier for me to import and sync my designs.

Moreover, InVision's collaboration feature is excellent. It enables real-time feedback from stakeholders or team members directly on the design. The version control feature ensures that I can easily track changes and revert to previous versions if necessary. With a user-friendly interface and robust functionality, InVision proves to be a powerful tool for UX/UI designers.

InVision is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Mural: 95 vs 93

Mural is a better solution for customer support than InVision: 4.5 vs 4.4

Mural is easier to set up than InVision: 4.5 vs 4.4

InVision is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Mural: 4.3 vs 4.2

Mural is better at number of features than InVision: 59 vs 54

I find InVision to be a strong alternative to Mural due to its robust features and user-friendly interface. InVision offers an intuitive design and prototyping tool that makes it easy for teams to collaborate, share feedback, and streamline the design process. It also provides a range of functionalities such as interactive prototypes, animation, and design components that are not readily available in Mural.

Moreover, InVision's seamless integration with tools like Slack, JIRA, and Trello enhances its usability. The platform also has a feature called 'Inspect' which significantly simplifies the handoff by automatically translating designs into code. This feature can save developers a lot of time and effort.

Overall, while both platforms have their strengths, I believe InVision's additional features and integrations make it a compelling alternative to Mural for design teams.

Comparing these 2 applications, I can say that InVision and Mural, while both being excellent tools for design collaboration, have some key differences. InVision is primarily focused on prototyping and user interface design. It allows designers to create interactive mockups for web and mobile projects which greatly assists in the design process. For its part, Mural is more about brainstorming and collaboration. It provides digital workspaces for teams to collaborate in real-time, making it ideal for ideation, creating user stories, or planning sprints.

Another significant difference lies in their functionality. InVision has robust features for animation and transition between screens, which is quite beneficial for demonstrating the flow of applications. Conversely, Mural doesn't support prototyping but excels in providing a visual collaboration platform with sticky notes, drawings, diagrams, etc., which can be extremely helpful during the initial stages of a project.

PandaSuite is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than InVision: 100 vs 95

PandaSuite is a better solution for customer support than InVision: 4.8 vs 4.4

PandaSuite's user interface is more convenient than InVision: 4.7 vs 4.4

PandaSuite pricing plans are more competitive than InVision: 4.6 vs 4.3

InVision has more functions than PandaSuite: 54 vs 10

I believe InVision is a great alternative to PandaSuite because of its robust and user-friendly features. InVision is a digital product design platform known for its collaborative tools, which allow designers and stakeholders to seamlessly work together in real-time. It offers interactive and animated prototyping, user testing, and design sharing, making it easier to gather feedback and make necessary adjustments. Unlike PandaSuite, InVision supports Sketch and Photoshop files, which are widely used by designers. It also integrates with popular tools like Slack, Jira, and Microsoft Teams, enhancing team communication and productivity. Furthermore, InVision provides educational resources such as webinars, blogs, and design tutorials that can be beneficial for beginners. Overall, InVision's comprehensive features and integrations make it a strong contender against PandaSuite.

I have used both InVision and PandaSuite for different projects and found that they each have their unique strengths. InVision is primarily a prototyping tool used for creating interactive and dynamic design prototypes. It's great for collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on a project simultaneously, and it integrates well with other design tools like Sketch and Adobe XD.

On the other hand, PandaSuite is a more comprehensive platform that allows you to create interactive apps, e-books, and web content without coding. It offers more flexibility in terms of interactivity and animation capabilities. However, it might have a steeper learning curve compared to InVision due to its extensive features. So, while InVision is excellent for prototyping and team collaboration, PandaSuite is more suited for creating interactive digital experiences.

Whimsical has more positive reviews than InVision: 98 vs 95

Whimsical is better at support than InVision: 4.5 vs 4.4

Whimsical is easier to use than InVision: 5.0 vs 4.4

Whimsical is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than InVision: 4.6 vs 4.3

InVision has more features than Whimsical: 54 vs 8

Moqups has better positive reviews compared to InVision: 96 vs 95

InVision is better at customer service than Moqups: 4.4 vs 4.0

Moqups is more user friendly than InVision: 4.5 vs 4.4

InVision is better at value for money than Moqups: 4.3 vs 4.1

InVision has more options than Moqups: 54 vs 50

InVision is better at support than Lucidchart: 4.4 vs 4.3

Lucidchart pricing plans are more competitive than InVision: 4.4 vs 4.3

Lucidchart has more options than InVision: 69 vs 54

Photoshop is better at customer support than InVision: 4.6 vs 4.4

Photoshop is easier to set up than InVision: 4.7 vs 4.4

Photoshop is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than InVision: 4.6 vs 4.3

Photoshop is more versatile than InVision: 70 vs 54

As a designer, I find Photoshop a good alternative to Invision. Photoshop is not just an image editing tool; it also offers robust features for UI/UX design. Unlike Invision which is purely a prototyping tool, Photoshop provides a wider range of functionalities including photo manipulation, graphic design, and even 3D modeling. This makes Photoshop more versatile and allows me to handle various aspects of design in one place.

Moreover, Photoshop's layer-based working style gives me the flexibility to control every element in my design precisely. It also comes with an extensive library of brushes, patterns, and effects that can enhance the visual appeal of my designs.

While Invision excels in collaboration features, Photoshop's integration with other Adobe products like Illustrator and XD makes it possible to build comprehensive design systems. Therefore, for its versatility and precision control, I consider Photoshop a viable alternative to Invision.

I use both Photoshop and Invision in my design workflow, and they serve different uses. Photoshop, developed by Adobe, is a comprehensive graphic editing program used primarily for raster graphics. It's perfect for creating and editing images, website layouts, logos, and other design elements. It's highly versatile with a vast range of tools and capabilities.

In contrast, Invision is a prototyping tool that allows designers to create interactive mockups for web and mobile projects. While it doesn't have the graphic creation capabilities of Photoshop, it excels in providing real-time feedback and collaboration. Designers can easily share their prototypes with clients or team members who can then comment directly on the designs.

Therefore, while both are valuable tools for designers, they are used at different stages of the design process - Photoshop for creating elements and Invision for piecing them together into a cohesive user interface.

Figma is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than InVision: 97 vs 95

Figma is a better solution for customer support than InVision: 4.5 vs 4.4

Figma is better at ease to use than InVision: 4.5 vs 4.4

Figma is better at value for money than InVision: 4.6 vs 4.3

InVision has more functions than Figma: 54 vs 23

InVision is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Mystudio: 95 vs 89

Mystudio is a better solution for customer support than InVision: 4.5 vs 4.4

InVision is better at ease to use than Mystudio: 4.4 vs 4.0

Mystudio is better at value for money than InVision: 4.6 vs 4.3

Mystudio is more versatile than InVision: 109 vs 54

InVision has more positive reviews than Proto.io: 95 vs 85

InVision is better at support than Proto.io: 4.4 vs 4.3

InVision is easy to use compared to Proto.io: 4.4 vs 4.3

InVision pricing plans are more competitive than Proto.io: 4.3 vs 4.0

InVision has more functions than Proto.io: 54 vs 13