7 Best Alternatives to Altaro vm backup in November 2024

Vmware cloud director availability is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Altaro vm backup: 100 vs 98

Altaro vm backup is a better solution for customer support than Vmware cloud director availability: 4.8 vs 4.5

Altaro vm backup's user interface is more convenient than Vmware cloud director availability: 4.8 vs 4.5

Altaro vm backup pricing plans are more competitive than Vmware cloud director availability: 4.7 vs 4.6

Altaro vm backup is better at number of features than Vmware cloud director availability: 62 vs 61

I believe Altaro VM Backup is a great alternative to VMware Cloud Director Availability because of its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. While both solutions offer robust backup and disaster recovery features for virtual machines, Altaro stands out with its user-friendly interface that simplifies the often complex process of backing up and recovering data. It supports both Hyper-V and VMware environments, providing a more flexible solution for different IT needs. Additionally, Altaro VM Backup offers outstanding support and a variety of useful features like deduplication, compression, and military-grade encryption for secure backups. Its pricing model is also more affordable compared to VMware, making it an ideal choice for small and medium-sized businesses looking for a reliable yet budget-friendly VM backup solution.

As an IT professional, I can point out several key differences between Altaro VM Backup and VMware Cloud Director Availability. Altaro VM Backup is primarily a backup and replication solution for Hyper-V and VMware, providing robust, streamlined, enterprise-level functionality. It offers features like offsite backups, remote management, and granular restore options. On the other side, VMware Cloud Director Availability is a disaster recovery and migration solution designed specifically for vCloud Director environments. It enables cloud providers to offer simple, secure, and cost-effective onboarding, migration, and disaster recovery services to and from multi-tenant VMware clouds. While both tools offer data protection for virtual environments, their primary functionalities and target audiences differ quite significantly. Altaro is more focused on backup and recovery while VMware Cloud Director Availability focuses on disaster recovery and migration.

Altaro vm backup has better positive reviews than Fusion framework system: 98 vs 88

Altaro vm backup is better at customer support than Fusion framework system: 4.8 vs 4.5

Altaro vm backup is better at ease to use than Fusion framework system: 4.8 vs 4.0

Altaro vm backup is better at value for money than Fusion framework system: 4.7 vs 4.1

Fusion framework system is better at number of features than Altaro vm backup: 79 vs 62

I find Altaro VM Backup to be a commendable alternative to the Fusion Framework System due to its robust features and simplicity. It provides a streamlined solution for backing up and replicating both Hyper-V and VMware-based virtual machines from a single console. Unlike Fusion Framework, Altaro offers a more intuitive user interface, making it easy for non-technical users to easily manage their backups.

Moreover, Altaro VM Backup includes features such as offsite backup replication, granular restore options for individual files and emails, and instant boot from backup. These features provide a comprehensive disaster recovery solution. In terms of cost-effectiveness, Altaro's flexible pricing model proves to be more advantageous for small and medium-sized businesses compared to Fusion Framework System. Therefore, in terms of ease-of-use, feature set and pricing, I would recommend Altaro VM Backup as a good alternative.

I have researched and found that Altaro VM Backup and Fusion Framework System are quite distinct in their functionalities. Altaro VM Backup is primarily a backup solution specifically designed for virtual machines, including those run on Hyper-V and VMware. This software focuses on providing secure, efficient, and streamlined backups for virtual environments, ensuring data protection and quick recovery in case of any issues.

On the other hand, Fusion Framework System is a business continuity and risk management platform. It's not a backup tool, rather it's designed to help organizations understand their risk profile, plan for potential business disruptions and ensure the continuity of critical operations during such events. It provides tools for disaster recovery planning, business impact analysis, and risk assessment.

Therefore, while both are important for a business's data management strategy, they serve different objectives: Altaro for data backup and recovery in virtualized environments, and Fusion Framework for comprehensive risk management and business continuity planning.

Altaro vm backup has more positive reviews than Atera: 98 vs 95

Altaro vm backup is better at support than Atera: 4.8 vs 4.5

Altaro vm backup is easier to use than Atera: 4.8 vs 4.5

Atera is more versatile than Altaro vm backup: 131 vs 62

As a professional in the tech industry, I find Altaro VM Backup to be a great alternative to Atera. One of the main reasons is its specialization in virtual machine (VM) backup, which makes it a robust and reliable solution for businesses running VM environments. It supports both Microsoft Hyper-V and VMware, offering a broad range of compatibility.

Altaro VM Backup also stands out with its ease of use. The software has an intuitive interface that simplifies the backup and recovery process. It also offers features like deduplication, compression, and military-grade encryption to ensure data security. Moreover, Altaro provides excellent customer support, including a helpful online knowledge base and responsive live chat.

While Atera is a comprehensive IT management platform, if your primary need is VM backup, Altaro VM Backup is an excellent specialized alternative.

As an IT professional, I find Altaro VM Backup and Atera to be two distinct software solutions. Altaro VM Backup is a specialized tool designed primarily for backing up and restoring virtual machines (VMs). It supports platforms like Hyper-V and VMware, offering functionalities like deduplication, compression, encryption, and replication of VMs. It's a go-to for disaster recovery in virtualized environments.

On the other hand, Atera is a comprehensive remote monitoring and management (RMM) platform. It's more of an all-in-one IT management solution that includes functionalities like patch management, remote control, real-time alerts, ticketing, billing, reporting, and more. Atera supports a wide range of devices and is designed to help managed service providers (MSPs) or IT departments manage their IT infrastructure more efficiently.

In summary, while Altaro VM Backup focuses on VM backup and recovery, Atera provides a broader range of IT management tools.

Altaro vm backup has more positive reviews than Pulseway: 98 vs 97

Altaro vm backup is better at support than Pulseway: 4.8 vs 4.5

Altaro vm backup is easier to use than Pulseway: 4.8 vs 4.5

Pulseway has more functions than Altaro vm backup: 163 vs 62

Altaro vm backup has better positive reviews compared to ServiceNow: 98 vs 93

Altaro vm backup is better at customer service than ServiceNow: 4.8 vs 4.3

Altaro vm backup is easy to use compared to ServiceNow: 4.8 vs 4.1

Altaro vm backup pricing plans are more competitive than ServiceNow: 4.7 vs 4.2

ServiceNow has more features than Altaro vm backup: 66 vs 62

Altaro vm backup is better at customer service than AWS Activate: 4.8 vs 4.6

Altaro vm backup is easier to use than AWS Activate: 4.8 vs 4.5

Altaro vm backup is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than AWS Activate: 4.7 vs 4.4

Altaro vm backup has better positive reviews compared to Datto siris: 98 vs 89

Altaro vm backup is better at customer service than Datto siris: 4.8 vs 4.5

Altaro vm backup is easy to use compared to Datto siris: 4.8 vs 4.5

Altaro vm backup pricing plans are more competitive than Datto siris: 4.7 vs 4.2

Altaro vm backup is more versatile than Datto siris: 62 vs 41