11 Best Alternatives to Ceipal ATS in November 2024

Ceipal ATS has better positive reviews than Zoho Recruit: 95 vs 91

Ceipal ATS is better at customer support than Zoho Recruit: 4.5 vs 4.0

Zoho Recruit has more functions than Ceipal ATS: 99 vs 94

I find CEIPAL ATS a great alternative to Zoho Recruit due to several reasons. Firstly, it offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface that simplifies the recruitment process. It also features robust automation capabilities, which help in streamlining various tasks such as resume parsing, job posting, and candidate tracking. This substantially reduces manual work and increases efficiency.

Secondly, CEIPAL ATS provides detailed analytics and reports that offer insights into the recruitment process, helping in making data-driven decisions. Additionally, it has excellent integration capabilities with various job boards and social media platforms, broadening the scope of sourcing candidates. Lastly, their customer support is commendable for their promptness and effectiveness in resolving issues. Therefore, considering these features and benefits, I believe CEIPAL ATS stands out as a strong alternative to Zoho Recruit.

I have found that CEIPAL ATS and Zoho Recruit, while both being Applicant Tracking Systems, have different strengths and features. CEIPAL ATS is a comprehensive system that focuses on automating the recruitment process, making it easier to source, track, and hire candidates. It has advanced AI capabilities for resume parsing and offers a robust reporting feature that provides insights into hiring trends.

On the other hand, Zoho Recruit is not just an ATS but also a recruitment CRM. It's more suited for managing relationships with candidates and clients. It offers features like candidate relationship management, interview scheduling, and automated job posting to multiple job boards. While Zoho Recruit also supports resume parsing, its strength lies in its integrations with various Zoho products and other popular apps.

Overall, both systems are powerful tools for recruitment but they cater to different needs depending on whether your focus is more on automation or relationship management.

Ceipal ATS has better positive reviews compared to Oorwin: 95 vs 94

Oorwin is better at customer service than Ceipal ATS: 5.0 vs 4.5

Ceipal ATS is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Oorwin: 4.6 vs 4.5

Oorwin has more features than Ceipal ATS: 193 vs 94

I believe CEIPAL ATS is a good alternative to Oorwin because it offers a variety of features that cater to different recruitment needs. CEIPAL ATS provides AI-powered job posting, which can help in reaching the right candidates efficiently. Its automated resume parsing and candidate ranking system can also save significant time during the selection process.

Moreover, CEIPAL ATS has an intuitive interface with customizable dashboards, providing a more personalized user experience. It also offers robust reporting and analytics tools for tracking performance and improving decision-making. Additionally, it supports seamless integration with various job boards and HR systems, enhancing its functionality and convenience.

While Oorwin is also a great platform, CEIPAL ATS's comprehensive features, user-friendly interface, and flexible integrations make it a strong contender in the market of Applicant Tracking Systems.

I have found that CEIPAL ATS and Oorwin are both powerful recruitment and talent management platforms, yet they have some key differences. CEIPAL ATS is more focused on providing a user-friendly interface for recruiters to manage applicant tracking, onboarding, and workforce management. It offers robust features such as AI-driven search capabilities, job board integrations, and advanced analytics.

In contrast, Oorwin integrates sales, recruitment, and human resources into a single platform. This holistic approach allows users to streamline their operations across different departments. Oorwin also provides AI-driven insights to help businesses make data-driven decisions and offers built-in CRM and HRM functionalities.

While both tools offer excellent features, the choice between them would largely depend on the specific needs of your organization. Whether you prioritize a specialized tool like CEIPAL ATS or an integrated solution like Oorwin will depend on your business requirements.

Ceipal ATS is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Workable: 95 vs 90

Ceipal ATS is better at value for money than Workable: 4.6 vs 4.1

Workable has more options than Ceipal ATS: 101 vs 94

I believe CEIPAL ATS is a great alternative to Workable because of its comprehensive and user-friendly features. It offers a robust applicant tracking system that streamlines the recruitment process, making it easier to source, track, and hire candidates. Unlike Workable, CEIPAL ATS provides AI-powered job posting, which can significantly enhance the visibility of job posts. It also offers advanced analytics and reporting tools that provide valuable insights into the hiring process. Furthermore, CEIPAL ATS is highly customizable, allowing it to be tailored to the specific needs of any business. Its pricing is also more flexible and affordable compared to Workable, making it a cost-effective choice for businesses of all sizes. Lastly, CEIPAL ATS has excellent customer support that is always ready to assist users. Therefore, for its superior features and affordability, I consider CEIPAL ATS a good alternative to Workable.

As a user of both CEIPAL ATS and Workable, I've noticed several key differences between the two. Firstly, CEIPAL ATS is more focused on providing a comprehensive solution for HR and staffing agencies, with features like mass mailing, resume parsing, and advanced search options. It also offers integrations with various job boards and VMS portals. On the other hand, Workable is more suited for businesses of all sizes looking to streamline their hiring process. It provides an intuitive interface with features like candidate tracking, interview scheduling, and customizable hiring pipelines. However, it lacks some of the advanced features offered by CEIPAL ATS. Secondly, in terms of pricing, CEIPAL ATS is more affordable than Workable, making it a better choice for small businesses or startups on a tight budget. Lastly, while both offer good customer support, users have reported that CEIPAL ATS provides faster response times.

Ceipal ATS has more positive reviews than Greenhouse: 95 vs 94

Ceipal ATS is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Greenhouse: 4.6 vs 4.3

Ceipal ATS has more features than Greenhouse: 94 vs 73

Ceipal ATS has more positive reviews than SmartRecruiters: 95 vs 83

Ceipal ATS is better at support than SmartRecruiters: 4.5 vs 4.3

Ceipal ATS is more user friendly than SmartRecruiters: 4.5 vs 4.3

Ceipal ATS is better at value for money than SmartRecruiters: 4.6 vs 4.2

Ceipal ATS has more features than SmartRecruiters: 94 vs 33

Ashby has more positive reviews than Ceipal ATS: 100 vs 95

Ashby is better at support than Ceipal ATS: 4.8 vs 4.5

Ashby is easy to use compared to Ceipal ATS: 5.0 vs 4.5

Ashby pricing plans are more competitive than Ceipal ATS: 4.8 vs 4.6

Ceipal ATS has more functions than Ashby: 94 vs 3

Ceipal ATS has better positive reviews compared to JobDiva: 95 vs 92

Ceipal ATS is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than JobDiva: 4.6 vs 4.4

Ceipal ATS is better at number of features than JobDiva: 94 vs 82

Ceipal ATS has better positive reviews than Hired: 95 vs 82

Ceipal ATS is better at customer support than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Ceipal ATS is better at ease to use than Hired: 4.5 vs 4.4

Ceipal ATS is better at value for money than Hired: 4.6 vs 3.7

Ceipal ATS has more options than Hired: 94 vs 28

Firefish is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Ceipal ATS: 96 vs 95

Firefish is a better solution for customer support than Ceipal ATS: 5.0 vs 4.5

Firefish is better at value for money than Ceipal ATS: 4.7 vs 4.6

Ceipal ATS is more versatile than Firefish: 94 vs 71

I believe Firefish is a great alternative to CEIPAL-ATS because it offers a more user-friendly interface and comprehensive features that streamline the recruitment process. Firefish is designed with simplicity and efficiency in mind, making it easier for recruiters to manage their tasks. It provides excellent candidate tracking, job posting, and reporting tools. In addition, its social media integration capabilities are more advanced which makes it easier to reach potential candidates. Unlike CEIPAL-ATS, Firefish also offers a built-in CRM system which helps build stronger relationships with clients and candidates alike. This integration of systems reduces the need for multiple platforms and therefore streamlines workflow. Furthermore, Firefish has a reputation for providing excellent customer service, something that many users find lacking in CEIPAL-ATS. In summary, Firefish's ease of use, comprehensive features, and excellent customer service make it a fantastic alternative to CEIPAL-ATS.

As a user, I've noticed several differences between Firefish and CEIPAL-ATS. Firefish is a recruitment marketing platform that combines website CMS, CRM, marketing, and analytics in one solution. It is designed to help recruiters reach, engage, and recruit top candidates before their competitors. It's particularly suited to agencies that want to maximize their online presence and engage with candidates more proactively.

On the other hand, CEIPAL-ATS is an end-to-end Human Capital Management software designed more for businesses looking to streamline their hiring process. It offers features like job posting, applicant tracking, onboarding tools, and time-sheet management. While it also provides recruitment solutions, it goes beyond this with broader HR functionalities. Thus, the main difference lies in their focus; Firefish is more candidate-centric and engagement-focused, while CEIPAL-ATS offers a broader range of HR solutions.

Ceipal ATS has better positive reviews than Grove hr: 95 vs 88

Ceipal ATS pricing plans are more competitive than Grove hr: 4.6 vs 4.4

Ceipal ATS is better at number of features than Grove hr: 94 vs 72