14 Best Alternatives to Photoshop in November 2024

Photoshop is better at support than InVision: 4.6 vs 4.4

Photoshop is more user friendly than InVision: 4.7 vs 4.4

Photoshop is better at value for money than InVision: 4.6 vs 4.3

Photoshop is more versatile than InVision: 70 vs 54

As a designer, I find Photoshop a good alternative to Invision. Photoshop is not just an image editing tool; it also offers robust features for UI/UX design. Unlike Invision which is purely a prototyping tool, Photoshop provides a wider range of functionalities including photo manipulation, graphic design, and even 3D modeling. This makes Photoshop more versatile and allows me to handle various aspects of design in one place.

Moreover, Photoshop's layer-based working style gives me the flexibility to control every element in my design precisely. It also comes with an extensive library of brushes, patterns, and effects that can enhance the visual appeal of my designs.

While Invision excels in collaboration features, Photoshop's integration with other Adobe products like Illustrator and XD makes it possible to build comprehensive design systems. Therefore, for its versatility and precision control, I consider Photoshop a viable alternative to Invision.

I use both Photoshop and Invision in my design workflow, and they serve different uses. Photoshop, developed by Adobe, is a comprehensive graphic editing program used primarily for raster graphics. It's perfect for creating and editing images, website layouts, logos, and other design elements. It's highly versatile with a vast range of tools and capabilities.

In contrast, Invision is a prototyping tool that allows designers to create interactive mockups for web and mobile projects. While it doesn't have the graphic creation capabilities of Photoshop, it excels in providing real-time feedback and collaboration. Designers can easily share their prototypes with clients or team members who can then comment directly on the designs.

Therefore, while both are valuable tools for designers, they are used at different stages of the design process - Photoshop for creating elements and Invision for piecing them together into a cohesive user interface.

Figma is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Photoshop: 97 vs 95

Photoshop is a better solution for customer support than Figma: 4.6 vs 4.5

Photoshop is better at ease to use than Figma: 4.7 vs 4.5

Photoshop has more functions than Figma: 70 vs 23

I find Photoshop a great alternative to Figma because of its extensive features and capabilities. Unlike Figma, which is primarily a web-based interface design tool, Photoshop offers a broader range of tools for image manipulation, retouching, and graphic design. This makes it more versatile for different creative tasks.

Photoshop's layer styles and blending options offer more depth in creating complex designs. Its support for 3D design is a significant advantage over Figma. Moreover, Photoshop's wide user base ensures an abundance of resources and tutorials available online.

While Figma excels in collaboration and prototyping, Photoshop remains the go-to software for intricate graphic design tasks. The decision between the two often depends on specific project requirements. However, Photoshop's versatility and powerful features make it a worthy alternative to Figma.

As a graphic designer, I have worked extensively with both Photoshop and Figma. The most significant difference between the two is their purpose. Photoshop, developed by Adobe, is primarily used for photo editing and graphic design. It's a raster-based software, meaning it works best with pixels and can create highly detailed images.

Figma, For its part, is a web-based UI/UX design application with tools for team collaboration. It's vector-based, which makes it more suitable for creating interfaces and other scalable designs. Unlike Photoshop, Figma allows multiple users to work on the same project simultaneously in real-time.

Another notable difference is their pricing models. Photoshop requires a monthly subscription fee while Figma offers both free and premium plans. However, Photoshop has more advanced features for photo manipulation compared to Figma.

Marq (ex. Lucidpress) is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Photoshop: 96 vs 95

Photoshop is a better solution for customer support than Marq (ex. Lucidpress): 4.6 vs 4.3

Photoshop's user interface is more convenient than Marq (ex. Lucidpress): 4.7 vs 4.5

Photoshop pricing plans are more competitive than Marq (ex. Lucidpress): 4.6 vs 4.4

Marq (ex. Lucidpress) has more features than Photoshop: 85 vs 70

I believe Photoshop is a good alternative to Lucidpress due to its extensive features and capabilities. Photoshop is a powerful tool that allows for more advanced editing and design options. It offers a wide range of tools for photo editing, graphic design, and even 3D modeling. This makes it a versatile choice for professionals who need more than just basic layout and design capabilities.

Moreover, Photoshop has been around for a long time and has a large user community. This means there are plenty of tutorials, guides, and resources available to help you learn and master the software. While Lucidpress is more user-friendly for beginners, Photoshop's advanced features make it a better choice for those who want to take their designs to the next level.

As a user of both Photoshop and Lucidpress, I've noticed several key differences between the two. Photoshop, developed by Adobe, is a powerful image editing software that allows for intricate manipulation of photos and creation of digital art. It's ideal for professional photographers, graphic designers, and artists who need advanced tools and features.

On the other hand, Lucidpress is an online design tool primarily used for creating marketing material such as brochures, newsletters, and social media posts. It offers a range of templates and a user-friendly interface that makes it accessible to beginners or non-designers. Unlike Photoshop, Lucidpress also allows for real-time collaboration, making it a great choice for teams.

In summary, while Photoshop is more suitable for complex image editing and digital art creation, Lucidpress is better suited for simpler design tasks and collaborative projects.

Pixpa is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Photoshop: 98 vs 95

Pixpa is a better solution for customer support than Photoshop: 5.0 vs 4.6

Photoshop is better at ease to use than Pixpa: 4.7 vs 4.5

Pixpa is better at value for money than Photoshop: 4.8 vs 4.6

Photoshop has more options than Pixpa: 70 vs 56

Photoshop is better at customer support than Webflow: 4.6 vs 4.0

Photoshop is better at ease to use than Webflow: 4.7 vs 4.0

Photoshop is better at value for money than Webflow: 4.6 vs 4.2

Canva has better positive reviews compared to Photoshop: 97 vs 95

Photoshop is better at customer service than Canva: 4.6 vs 4.5

Photoshop is easier to use than Canva: 4.7 vs 4.5

Photoshop has more features than Canva: 70 vs 67

InDesign is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Photoshop: 100 vs 95

Photoshop is a better solution for customer support than InDesign: 4.6 vs 4.2

Photoshop's user interface is more convenient than InDesign: 4.7 vs 4.1

Photoshop pricing plans are more competitive than InDesign: 4.6 vs 4.2

Photoshop is more versatile than InDesign: 70 vs 24

I find InDesign to be a great alternative to Photoshop primarily because it is specifically designed for layout and typesetting. Unlike Photoshop, which is primarily used for photo editing and creating raster images, InDesign excels in creating multi-page documents such as books, magazines, brochures, and portfolios with ease. It allows me to manage a large number of pages with automatic page numbering, master pages, and the ability to link text boxes. The grid system in InDesign also makes it easier to align elements consistently across different pages. Furthermore, InDesign supports vector graphics which means I can scale images without losing quality. While both have their unique strengths, if the project involves heavy text layout or multi-page documents, I would choose InDesign over Photoshop.

I have used both Adobe InDesign and Photoshop extensively and can attest to their unique features. Photoshop, as a raster graphics software, is primarily designed for creating and editing images. It excels in photo manipulation, digital painting, and graphic design where detailed image editing is required. However, it's not ideal for handling large amounts of text or creating multi-page layouts.

On the other hand, InDesign is a desktop publishing software that excels in layout design. It's perfect for designing magazines, newspapers, books, brochures or anything that combines text with images and needs to be outputted in high quality for print. It provides more control over typography and has better tools for long-form text management. Unlike Photoshop, InDesign isn't designed for detailed image editing or creating original artwork from scratch.

Photoshop is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Mystudio: 95 vs 89

Photoshop is a better solution for customer support than Mystudio: 4.6 vs 4.5

Photoshop is better at ease to use than Mystudio: 4.7 vs 4.0

Mystudio is more versatile than Photoshop: 109 vs 70