12 Best Alternatives to InDesign in November 2024

InDesign has better positive reviews than Illustrator: 100 vs 95

Illustrator is better at customer support than InDesign: 4.6 vs 4.2

Illustrator is better at ease to use than InDesign: 4.7 vs 4.1

Illustrator is better at value for money than InDesign: 4.6 vs 4.2

Illustrator is better at number of features than InDesign: 70 vs 24

As a graphic designer, I find InDesign to be a great alternative to Illustrator. While both are products of Adobe and can be used for graphic design, they serve different purposes. Illustrator is primarily used for creating and editing vector-based drawings such as logos and graphics. On the other hand, InDesign is built specifically for layout design projects like magazines, brochures, posters, and eBooks. Its tools allow for easy manipulation of text and images within a predefined layout. It also supports multi-page projects, which is not an option in Illustrator. Additionally, InDesign offers better typesetting capabilities which makes it ideal for working with large amounts of text. So, if you're working on a project that requires detailed layout design or involves extensive text manipulation, InDesign might be the better choice over Illustrator.

I often find myself working with both Adobe InDesign and Adobe Illustrator, two powerful design tools with distinct features. While they may seem similar, there are key differences that distinguish them. Primarily, InDesign is a desktop publishing software best suited for creating multi-page documents like books, magazines, brochures and reports. It excels in text formatting, layout design and prepress tasks.

Alternatively, Illustrator is a vector-based drawing tool designed for creating and editing graphics. It's ideal for designing logos, icons, sketches, typography and complex illustrations for any medium. Unlike InDesign, Illustrator doesn't handle multi-page layouts as efficiently but it offers more flexibility in terms of graphic creation and manipulation.

In summary, while there is some overlap in their functionalities, InDesign is more specialized in layout design and text handling whereas Illustrator shines in creating and editing vector-based graphics.

InDesign has better positive reviews than Photoshop: 100 vs 95

Photoshop is better at customer support than InDesign: 4.6 vs 4.2

Photoshop is easier to set up than InDesign: 4.7 vs 4.1

Photoshop is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than InDesign: 4.6 vs 4.2

Photoshop is more versatile than InDesign: 70 vs 24

I find InDesign to be a great alternative to Photoshop primarily because it is specifically designed for layout and typesetting. Unlike Photoshop, which is primarily used for photo editing and creating raster images, InDesign excels in creating multi-page documents such as books, magazines, brochures, and portfolios with ease. It allows me to manage a large number of pages with automatic page numbering, master pages, and the ability to link text boxes. The grid system in InDesign also makes it easier to align elements consistently across different pages. Furthermore, InDesign supports vector graphics which means I can scale images without losing quality. While both have their unique strengths, if the project involves heavy text layout or multi-page documents, I would choose InDesign over Photoshop.

I have used both Adobe InDesign and Photoshop extensively and can attest to their unique features. Photoshop, as a raster graphics software, is primarily designed for creating and editing images. It excels in photo manipulation, digital painting, and graphic design where detailed image editing is required. However, it's not ideal for handling large amounts of text or creating multi-page layouts.

On the other hand, InDesign is a desktop publishing software that excels in layout design. It's perfect for designing magazines, newspapers, books, brochures or anything that combines text with images and needs to be outputted in high quality for print. It provides more control over typography and has better tools for long-form text management. Unlike Photoshop, InDesign isn't designed for detailed image editing or creating original artwork from scratch.

InDesign has better positive reviews compared to Canva: 100 vs 97

Canva is better at customer service than InDesign: 4.5 vs 4.2

Canva is easier to use than InDesign: 4.5 vs 4.1

Canva is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than InDesign: 4.6 vs 4.2

Canva has more features than InDesign: 67 vs 24

I find Adobe InDesign to be a superior alternative to Canva due to its advanced features and capabilities. While Canva is known for its user-friendly interface and simplicity, InDesign takes design possibilities to another level. It offers a higher degree of control over every element in a design, making it ideal for complex projects that require precision. Its vast array of tools allows for more detailed and professional layouts. Moreover, InDesign supports a lot of file formats which makes it easier for collaboration and sharing. It also excels in handling multi-page designs like magazines and books efficiently. Although it has a steeper learning curve compared to Canva, the flexibility and robustness it provides make it worth the effort.

I have used both InDesign and Canva for various design projects. The most noticeable difference is that InDesign is a professional-grade software from Adobe, typically used by graphic designers, while Canva is an online tool more suited to beginners or those needing quick, simple designs. InDesign has a steeper learning curve but offers more control and advanced features. It allows for precise layout control, text editing and handling large files, making it ideal for creating multi-page documents like magazines or books.

On the other hand, Canva is user-friendly with a drag-and-drop interface and a wide range of pre-designed templates. It's great for social media posts, posters, or small-scale print projects. However, it lacks the advanced capabilities of InDesign. Another key difference is pricing: InDesign requires a subscription to Adobe Creative Cloud, while Canva has a free version with optional paid upgrades for more features.

InDesign is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Figma: 100 vs 97

Figma is a better solution for customer support than InDesign: 4.5 vs 4.2

Figma is better at ease to use than InDesign: 4.5 vs 4.1

Figma is better at value for money than InDesign: 4.6 vs 4.2

InDesign has more functions than Figma: 24 vs 23

InDesign is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Microsoft Word: 100 vs 95

Microsoft Word is a better solution for customer support than InDesign: 4.6 vs 4.2

Microsoft Word's user interface is more convenient than InDesign: 4.7 vs 4.1

Microsoft Word pricing plans are more competitive than InDesign: 4.6 vs 4.2

Microsoft Word has more features than InDesign: 70 vs 24

InDesign is better at customer support than Webflow: 4.2 vs 4.0

InDesign is better at ease to use than Webflow: 4.1 vs 4.0

InDesign has better positive reviews than Flipsnack: 100 vs 94

Flipsnack is better at customer support than InDesign: 4.4 vs 4.2

Flipsnack is easier to set up than InDesign: 4.5 vs 4.1

Flipsnack is better at number of features than InDesign: 105 vs 24

I believe Flipsnack is a great alternative to InDesign because it offers a more user-friendly interface. While InDesign is powerful and versatile, it can be complex and overwhelming for beginners or those who only need to create simple designs. Flipsnack, on the other hand, is incredibly intuitive and easy to use, even for those with no design experience. It's also web-based, so you don't need to download or install any software. This makes it easily accessible from any device with an internet connection. Additionally, Flipsnack offers a wide range of templates which can be customized according to your needs. Its pricing plans are also more affordable compared to InDesign's subscription model. So, for those looking for a simpler, more affordable design tool with sufficient capabilities, Flipsnack is a solid choice.

I have tested both Flipsnack and InDesign, and I've found that they offer quite different experiences. InDesign, developed by Adobe, is a professional-grade software used for creating all kinds of digital and print layouts. It's ideal for professionals who need advanced features for graphic design, typography, and page layout.

Alternatively, Flipsnack is an online tool that lets you easily create and publish digital flipbooks. It's more user-friendly and accessible for beginners or those without much design experience. While it doesn't have as many advanced features as InDesign, it does offer a simpler interface and the unique flipbook format.

In terms of pricing, InDesign typically requires a monthly subscription as part of Adobe's Creative Cloud suite. Flipsnack offers a freemium model with the option of paid upgrades for additional features.

InDesign is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Marq (ex. Lucidpress): 100 vs 96

Marq (ex. Lucidpress) is a better solution for customer support than InDesign: 4.3 vs 4.2

Marq (ex. Lucidpress)'s user interface is more convenient than InDesign: 4.5 vs 4.1

Marq (ex. Lucidpress) pricing plans are more competitive than InDesign: 4.4 vs 4.2

Marq (ex. Lucidpress) has more features than InDesign: 85 vs 24

I find Lucidpress to be a fantastic alternative to InDesign because of its user-friendly interface and cost-effectiveness. Unlike InDesign which requires a steep learning curve, Lucidpress is easy to navigate even for beginners. It offers a wide range of templates for various design needs like brochures, newsletters, and posters, making it convenient for users to start their projects.

Moreover, Lucidpress operates online, eliminating the need for software installation. This cloud-based solution allows for real-time collaboration, a feature that InDesign lacks. It facilitates team projects by enabling multiple users to work on the same document simultaneously.

Cost-wise, Lucidpress offers a free basic version and affordable premium plans, while InDesign can be relatively expensive. Therefore, for those seeking a budget-friendly, easy-to-use yet powerful design tool, Lucidpress provides an excellent alternative to InDesign.

As a user of both Lucidpress and InDesign, I've noticed distinct differences between these two software. Firstly, Lucidpress is a web-based platform that allows users to create professional quality print and digital publications. It is designed to be user-friendly and collaborative, enabling multiple users to work on a project simultaneously. It is ideal for small businesses or individuals who are just starting out in design.

On the other hand, Adobe InDesign is a more advanced software aimed at professionals. It offers more complex features and tools for detailed layout and typography work. While it requires a steeper learning curve, it provides greater flexibility and control over your designs. However, unlike Lucidpress, it doesn't support real-time collaboration.

In conclusion, while both are excellent tools for designing publications, the choice between Lucidpress and InDesign largely depends on your needs, level of expertise, and whether you require collaborative features or not.

InDesign has better positive reviews compared to Sawyer: 100 vs 92

Sawyer is better at customer service than InDesign: 4.5 vs 4.2

InDesign is easy to use compared to Sawyer: 4.1 vs 4.0

Sawyer pricing plans are more competitive than InDesign: 4.5 vs 4.2

Sawyer has more options than InDesign: 98 vs 24

I believe that the service Sawyer is a great alternative to InDesign for a number of reasons. Firstly, Sawyer is more user-friendly and less complex, making it an excellent choice for those who are new to graphic design or who don't need all the advanced features of InDesign. Secondly, it's cost-effective. Unlike Adobe InDesign, which can be quite expensive especially for small businesses or freelancers, Sawyer offers a more affordable pricing plan. Thirdly, it provides good collaboration features which makes it easier for teams to work together. Lastly, its cloud-based nature allows users to access and work on their designs from anywhere at any time. Therefore, for those seeking a simpler, cheaper, and more collaborative design tool, Sawyer is a good alternative to consider.

I have worked with both Sawyer and InDesign, and I can attest that they are different in many ways. First off, Sawyer is a business management software designed for children's activity providers. It allows businesses to schedule classes, manage enrollments, process payments, and communicate with parents. Its main focus is to streamline operations and improve customer experiences in the child service industry.

On the other hand, Adobe InDesign is a desktop publishing software used for creating layouts for print and digital publishing. It's used by graphic designers, artists, publishers, and marketing professionals to create posters, flyers, brochures, magazines, newspapers, presentations, books, and ebooks. InDesign is all about designing and layout while Sawyer is about business management. They serve different objectives and are used in entirely different industries.