12 Best Alternatives to Browserstack in May 2024

Alternatives & Competitors to Browserstack

  1. 1. DigitalOcean
  2. 2. LambdaTest
  3. 3. Wilco
  4. 4. Buddy
  5. 5. Spiratest
  6. 6. Leapwork
  7. 7. Qa wolf
  8. 8. Furioos
  9. 9. Thiga
View more

Here are competitors or alternatives to Browserstack and other similar Web Development software. You need to consider some important factors when choosing a tool like Browserstack for your business: the main features of each solution, ease of use of user interface, pricing or value for money for instance. Each software has its pros and cons so it's up to you to choose the best alternative to Browserstack that meets the needs of your small business. To help you compare each app and choose the right solution, we have put together a list of the best competitors of Browserstack. Discover sofware like DigitalOcean, LambdaTest, Wilco or Buddy.

List of Alternatives to Browserstack

From Web Development tools, we have selected the best alternatives to Browserstack based on reviews for each solution and similarities with Browserstack. Of course, each solution has its benefits and drawbacks, and its own features but, whether you are a small business, a startup or a large enterprise, you will find the right choice that empowers your projects.

Description

Easily develop and deploy your apps in complete security. Scale your business and manage your infrastructures with confidence.

DigitalOcean compared to Browserstack

Browserstack has more positive reviews than DigitalOcean: 94 vs 86

DigitalOcean pricing plans are more competitive than Browserstack: 4.5 vs 4.0

Browserstack is better at number of features than DigitalOcean: 18 vs 8

DigitalOcean: Pros & Cons

Data security: Stored information is secure and protected from end to end
Infrastructure availability: Platform availability exceeds 99.9%
Comprehensive offering: The DigitalOcean cloud platform offers a variety of features (virtual machine, application engine, storage, database)
Customer support: This platform does not offer live support
For experienced users: The DigitalOcean solution requires a good technical expertise
Service pricing: No free domain name or site migration

Best features

  • - Hosting and storing

  • - Database management

  • - Tools for devs

  • - Kubernetes

  • - Load Balancers

  • - Flexible Droplets

  • - Calculation

  • - Object Storage

DigitalOcean pricing

Droplets (Virtual Machines)

$4 / month

Spaces (Object Storage)

$5 / month

Volumes (Block Storage)

$10 / month

Load Balancers

$12 / month

Kubernetes

$12 / month

Databases (Fully Managed)

$15 / month

Popular

$5,000 in credits for 1 year (Save $5,000)

Description

With LambdaTest, developers can test the compliance of their code across over 2000 different browser configurations and operating systems.

LambdaTest compared to Browserstack

LambdaTest is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Browserstack: 100 vs 94

LambdaTest is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Browserstack: 4.6 vs 4.0

LambdaTest has more options than Browserstack: 32 vs 18

What's the difference between LambdaTest and Browserstack?

One of the primary distinctions between LambdaTest and BrowserStack lies in their pricing structures. While LambdaTest provides flexible pricing options starting at a lower entry point, BrowserStack tends to be positioned as the premium solution with higher starting prices. LambdaTest offers plans starting from $19 per month for its basic package, catering to the needs of startups and small teams, and scales...

LambdaTest: Pros & Cons

Speed of solution: Time-to-market is greatly reduced
Customer service: LambdaTest’s support is excellent
Ease of use: The platform is not easy to get to grips with and ergonomics are top-notch
Some slowness: Occasional slowness may occur when testing applications
Reporting: Reporting and logging could be improved
Platform cost: LambdaTest can be expensive for startups that only need to test a limited number of applications

Best features

  • - Cross-browser compatibility test

  • - Multi-device responsive test

  • - Geolocation test

  • - Visual UI testing

  • - Real-time testing

  • - Integrations

  • - Smart test logs

  • - Automated test

30% off any annual subscription plan (Save $568)

Description

Wilco offers you the opportunity to challenge your own skills or those of your employees via a development platform. This way, everyone can develop and practice technical skills and improve their skills in a fun and efficient way.

Wilco compared to Browserstack

Browserstack has better positive reviews than Wilco: 94 vs 85

Wilco is better at customer support than Browserstack: 4.6 vs 4.5

Wilco pricing plans are more competitive than Browserstack: 4.4 vs 4.0

Wilco is better at number of features than Browserstack: 52 vs 18

Wilco: Pros & Cons

Ease of use: Users can easily get to grips with the Wilco tool
Pricing plans: The pricing offered by this development training platform is competitive
Customer support: Wilco’s customer service is courteous and has solid expertise
High engagement rate: Developers appreciate the quest construction and the fun aspect of the quests
Video tutorial: A video introducing the product would be a plus to facilitate the integration of the collaborators

Best features

  • - Maximize employee performance

  • - Streamline the launch of projects

  • - Benefit from Wilco’s support

  • - Onboard new hires with ease

  • - Continuously develop employee skillsets

25% off the first year of an annual plan (Save $3,000)

Description

Buddy is the most effective way to build better apps faster. Buddy puts application development on autopilot and makes building apps scalable, creating a decentralized DevOps Marketplace and Automation GRID that challenges how today’s developers build, test and deploy their apps.

Buddy compared to Browserstack

Buddy has better positive reviews compared to Browserstack: 98 vs 94

Buddy is more user friendly than Browserstack: 5.0 vs 4.5

Buddy is better at value for money than Browserstack: 4.5 vs 4.0

Buddy has more features than Browserstack: 31 vs 18

Buddy: Pros & Cons

DevOps automation: Buddy provides a visual pipeline editor and a library of preconfigured actions
Continuous integration and deployment: Buddy automates the build, test, and deployment processes, making it easier to deliver software updates and releases
Extensive integrations: The platform integrates with a wide range of SaaS tools, including version control systems, cloud providers, and notification services
Learning curve complex configurations: Setting up complex CI/CD pipelines or custom configurations may require some technical expertise
Pricing structure: The available pricing plans may not be suitable for the budgets of all types of businesses, in particular small businesses
Limited support for certain technologies: Some users have reported limitations in terms of supported technologies or specific features within Buddy

Best features

  • - Business growth resources

  • - One-stop shop

  • - Global network

  • - Buddy’s comprehensive SaaS marketplace

  • - Personalized recommendations

  • - Top-tier SaaS experts

  • - Free trials

  • - Exclusive deals

Buddy pricing

Free

Pro

$31 / month

Hyper

$106 / month

Description

SpiraTest is a comprehensive quality assurance and test management system with integrated release scheduling and defect tracking. It manages your project's requirements, test cases, and defects/bugs with requirements traceability and real-time coverage analysis. SpiraTest is a complete quality assurance solution that offers synchronized desktop, web and mobile access.

Spiratest compared to Browserstack

Browserstack has better positive reviews than Spiratest: 94 vs 85

Browserstack's user interface is more convenient than Spiratest: 4.5 vs 4.0

Spiratest pricing plans are more competitive than Browserstack: 4.4 vs 4.0

Spiratest has more features than Browserstack: 84 vs 18

Spiratest: Pros & Cons

Traceability and Coverage Analysis: With SpiraTest, every project requirement, test case and defect are linked together. This allows for easy tracking of the coverage of your testing and which requirements have been successfully tested
User-friendly Interface: SpiraTest offers a simple, intuitive interface making it easy for non-technical users to navigate and manage the testing process.
Comprehensive Test Management: SpiraTest provides a complete quality assurance system that manages your project's requirements, releases, test cases, issues and tasks in one integrated environment
Limited Customization: Spiratest has limited flexibility when it comes to customizing the interface or workflows
Costly: Spiratest can be expensive, particularly for small businesses or startups with a tight budget.
High Learning Curve: The software can be complex to understand and use, especially for beginners

Best features

  • - Comprehensive Test Management

  • - Requirements Management

  • - Test Case Design

  • - Integration with Automation Tools

  • - Real-time Insights

Secret.

Go Premium

Get access to all our 367+ Premium deals for only $149/year.

Description

Leapwork is a no-code automation platform that enables businesses to automate repetitive tasks and processes. It features a visual, drag-and-drop interface, making it accessible to non-technical users. The software allows for test automation, robotic process automation (RPA), and data migration, among other functions. It integrates with existing systems and provides comprehensive reporting for improved decision-making.

Leapwork compared to Browserstack

Leapwork has more positive reviews than Browserstack: 98 vs 94

Leapwork is better at support than Browserstack: 4.8 vs 4.5

Leapwork is easier to use than Browserstack: 4.8 vs 4.5

Leapwork is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Browserstack: 4.3 vs 4.0

Leapwork has more functions than Browserstack: 62 vs 18

Leapwork: Pros & Cons

Ease of Use: Leapwork has a user-friendly interface that allows non-technical users to design and execute tests easily
Time Saving: The software enables fast automation with its pre-built, reusable automation components, reducing the time spent on routine tasks
Robust Reporting: Leapwork provides comprehensive and insightful reports, which help in identifying issues and making informed decisions.
Limited integrations: The software has limited integrations with other tools, which can restrict its functionality and versatility
Steep learning curve: Leapwork can be complex and difficult to learn for beginners or those without a technical background.
High cost: Leapwork's pricing is on the higher side, which may not be affordable for small businesses or startups

Best features

  • - Collaboration Features

  • - No-Code Interface

  • - Cross-Platform Automation

  • - Advanced Capabilities

  • - Reporting and Analytics Tools

Description

QA Wolf is an open-source software tool for creating, running, and maintaining browser tests. It allows developers to automate browser testing in minutes, with no coding required. Features include a user-friendly interface, continuous integration support, and automatic test generation. It's designed to save time and improve software quality by catching bugs before they reach users.

Qa wolf compared to Browserstack

Browserstack is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Qa wolf: 94 vs 0

Qa wolf is a better solution for customer support than Browserstack: 4.6 vs 4.5

Qa wolf is better at ease to use than Browserstack: 4.6 vs 4.5

Qa wolf is better at value for money than Browserstack: 4.6 vs 4.0

Qa wolf has more features than Browserstack: 30 vs 18

Qa wolf: Pros & Cons

Time Saving: The software allows for automated testing which significantly reduces the time spent on manual testing
Comprehensive Reporting: QA Wolf offers detailed test reports, making it easier to identify and fix issues.
Ease of Use: QA Wolf provides an intuitive user interface that makes it easy to create, run and manage tests
High Learning Curve: The software requires a certain level of technical knowledge and experience to be used effectively, making it less accessible for beginners
Lack of Advanced Features: While QA Wolf offers basic testing functionalities, it lacks more advanced features that are available in other testing tools, which can limit its effectiveness for complex projects.
Limited Customization: QA Wolf does not offer a lot of customization options, which can be limiting for users who want to tailor their testing environment to specific needs

Best features

  • - Ease of Use

  • - Code Generation

  • - Integration

  • - Scalability

  • - Continuous Testing

Description

Furioos makes it easy to share any 3D application and to integrate it into any website.

Furioos compared to Browserstack

Furioos has more positive reviews than Browserstack: 100 vs 94

Furioos is better at support than Browserstack: 4.7 vs 4.5

Browserstack is easier to use than Furioos: 4.5 vs 4.0

Furioos is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Browserstack: 4.6 vs 4.0

Furioos is more versatile than Browserstack: 211 vs 18

Best features

  • - Lightning-fast loading speeds

  • - Device flexibility

  • - Seamless integration

  • - Cloud-based convenience

  • - Collaborative features

  • - Scalable solutions

  • - Cost-effective pricing

  • - User-friendly interface

Description

Do product as unicorns do.

Thiga compared to Browserstack

Browserstack has better positive reviews than Thiga: 94 vs 85

Thiga is better at customer support than Browserstack: 4.6 vs 4.5

Thiga pricing plans are more competitive than Browserstack: 4.4 vs 4.0

Thiga has more options than Browserstack: 52 vs 18

Best features

  • - Prototype testing

  • - Product strategy

  • - UX design

  • - Scrum master

  • - Data analytics

  • - Agile training

  • - Agile coaching

  • - MVP development

Description

Your website should be your best salesperson, not an online brochure of information. Pneuma Media takes a revenue-first approach to online marketing and website development to better serve clients in the Indianapolis, Austin, Chicago, and Denver areas.

Pneuma compared to Browserstack

Pneuma has more positive reviews than Browserstack: 100 vs 94

Pneuma is better at support than Browserstack: 4.8 vs 4.5

Pneuma is more user friendly than Browserstack: 4.8 vs 4.5

Pneuma is better at value for money than Browserstack: 5.0 vs 4.0

Browserstack is better at number of features than Pneuma: 18 vs 16

Best features

  • -

  • -

  • -

  • -

  • -

  • -

Description

Create interactive user flow diagrams that tell a story

Overflow compared to Browserstack

Overflow has better positive reviews than Browserstack: 100 vs 94

Overflow is better at customer support than Browserstack: 5.0 vs 4.5

Overflow is easier to set up than Browserstack: 5.0 vs 4.5

Best features

  • - Design component library

  • - Collaboration and sharing

  • - Drag-and-drop interface

  • - Interactive prototyping

  • - User flow diagrams

  • - Export and integration

  • - Design consistency and documentation

Description

The "savoir-être, savoir-faire & devenir" of La Pilule Rouge are the assurance of a true competitiveness valuing a French style of development.

La Pilule Rouge compared to Browserstack

Browserstack is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than La Pilule Rouge: 94 vs 85

La Pilule Rouge is a better solution for customer support than Browserstack: 4.6 vs 4.5

La Pilule Rouge is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Browserstack: 4.4 vs 4.0

La Pilule Rouge has more options than Browserstack: 52 vs 18

Best features

  • - Business insights

  • - Mentoring

  • - Funding opportunities

  • - Save time & money

  • - Networking

  • - Community support

  • - Access to resources

  • - Inspiring success stories